• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Pendragon - a warning for you contractors

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Btw OP not sure why you've put without prejudice at the top of that - it has no meaning in this context

    Does it have meaning in any context,or is it a bit like Nick Griffin saying "I'm not prejudiced, but ...."
    Hard Brexit now!
    #prayfornodeal

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
      Does it have meaning in any context,or is it a bit like Nick Griffin saying "I'm not prejudiced, but ...."
      It's founded on a piece of contract case law but unless you are making a contractual offer of some kind (and even then mostly) it is pointless.

      Comment


        #13
        Okay. I am confused now. Without prejudice means what, and who invented it?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by PinkPoshRat View Post
          Okay. I am confused now. Without prejudice means what, and who invented it?
          I think it's mostly used to qualify a written discussion of contract terms prior to signing the contract, with the intended meaning that nothing agreed in those discussions is binding except in so far as the same is also in the contract, and that, contracts aside, anything discussed can be renegotiated in future.

          edit: A quick search shows that there are several meanings, e.g. here, which mostly seem to centre round not binding a party in future cases involving the issues under consideration.
          Last edited by OwlHoot; 3 August 2009, 16:09.
          Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

          Comment


            #15
            I dealt with a client manager many years ago, and he started every email with "without prejudice".

            I guess he must have been sued alot.

            Comment


              #16
              Starting every email message with WP is strange, but not as strange as adding in "the contents of this email may contain nuts" as the signature. That has to be one of the oddest ones I have seen.

              Comment


                #17
                sued a lot ?

                more like pseud a lot

                freaking wanna-be-lawyer-speak


                it's like thos cnts who give you a letter with 'By Hand' written on the front

                I want to write 'up @rse' and hand it back



                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  #18
                  If you substitute "without prejudice" with "I'm not admitting anything here, but....", you'll understand its meaning and its use.

                  Documents listed as being "without prejudice" have still successfully been used against the writer in court anyway, so personally I don't see the point.
                  Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by PinkPoshRat View Post
                    Okay. I am confused now. Without prejudice means what, and who invented it?
                    There has long been a general perception that putting "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in a letter / e-mail means that it cannot be used against you in court.

                    That is correct, but only applies in very specific circumstances.

                    It is usually used when negotiating a settlement. A settlement offer is made "without prejudice" so that the other person cannot produce your offer at court and use it against you i.e. - the offer doesn't prejudice your case.

                    This is so that the parties can make attempts at resolution without the offer coming back to bite them. This only applies to the offer though. Presenting evidence, arguing your case (and virtually everything else) can be fully admitted in court..

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by centurian View Post
                      There has long been a general perception that putting "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" in a letter / e-mail means that it cannot be used against you in court.

                      That is correct, but only applies in very specific circumstances.

                      It is usually used when negotiating a settlement. A settlement offer is made "without prejudice" so that the other person cannot produce your offer at court and use it against you i.e. - the offer doesn't prejudice your case.

                      This is so that the parties can make attempts at resolution without the offer coming back to bite them. This only applies to the offer though. Presenting evidence, arguing your case (and virtually everything else) can be fully admitted in court..
                      A couple of years ago I was helping someone out with debt collectors by researching other people's experiences and how they responded. Basically, every letter we sent setting out our position (i.e. you're not legally entitled to be chasing the debt until you show some evidence so GTFO ) was prefixed with WP to indicate that this wasn't our final position!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X