• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Operation Panther's Claw

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
    Tactical...the other sort leaves an unpleasant glow which isn't very friendly.
    The villages they are fighting in aren't big enough to warrant a tactical nuke. They can be taken out with 2 or 3 2000lb bombs. The use of a low-yield nuke is pointless.

    And despite what you might think, tactical nukes still leave behind a trail of nastiness that you wouldn't want to grow anything in for a couple of centuries.
    ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by zeitghost
      There were thoughts of using nukes in the earlier Korean unpleasantness, however the targeteers discovered that there really wasn't anything there that would warrant the expense... this applies even more to Afghanistan... the place is a raked over pile of tulipe already, so you'd just be wasting a weapon.
      there was talk (mostly in head) about dropping a chemical agent, exfolliant.

      apparently it makes all their beards fall off



      (\__/)
      (>'.'<)
      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

      Comment


        #13
        Ah okies, thanks for the corrections.

        Is there any way then of ensuring a quick and decisive victory, or does it really have to be a long and protracted crusade?

        Though I suppose it's good ongoing training for the troops at the end of it, which wouldn't be possible if we turned it in to a glass car park.
        Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

        C.S. Lewis

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by zeitghost
          Squaddies are much cheaper than nukes.

          That plutonium & U235 is expensive stuff you know, too good to waste.

          HTH.
          Oi!

          (Menelaus (and Churchill) = ex-squaddies).

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
            Ah okies, thanks for the corrections.

            Is there any way then of ensuring a quick and decisive victory, or does it really have to be a long and protracted crusade?

            Though I suppose it's good ongoing training for the troops at the end of it, which wouldn't be possible if we turned it in to a glass car park.
            first point. The military, who are the ones being killed, are excellent at coming up with ways of not being killed. They havn't come up with a new idea.


            second. Training - its true, the military need (and love) this type of experience, hard as it is to believe. I know lots of serving soldiers and they are gagging to get into action over there.


            As an old armchair warrior, my feeling is that we have to attack this from a religious point of view. i.e. persuade the moderate muslims to become more active in promoting a non-violent Islam.

            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by moorfield View Post
              Who on earth dreams up these ridiculous military operation names?

              Smacks of a department of overpaid civil servants with a big dictionary somehwere ....
              How about Operation Camel Toe?
              I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

              Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
              CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
              CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Pogle View Post
                How about Operation Camel Toe?
                That was the first Gulf War!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Pogle View Post
                  How about Operation Camel Toe?
                  been done.


                  1915 - Arabia


                  Major Lawrence - "Achmed - take your men and try to seperate the right flank"

                  "Captain Sponger - take the horse and seperate the left"


                  ALL - "And what about you, El Orenze?"


                  Major Lawrence - "I will take the main body, when the flanks have been divided I will thrust hard and fast through the centre"



                  source - winnets history of the Arabian campaign 1915



                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X