• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Cull all IT Contractors (and PMs) under 35

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
    ...and the reason is all the health and safety and PC crud that the jobsworths have layered on. The skills are still there, the intent is still there, it's just that people are handcuffed by idiots.
    Indeed.

    The NASA astronauts on the early (Mercury, Gemini, Apollo missions) were very brave men.

    They knew they could die at any time, on mission, or in training.

    In the 1960s NASA (and the USSR) did it by trial and error. Death was an everyday risk for their crews - whether in training or in actual mission flight.

    NASA has never lost a crew-member on any deep space mission, or Low Earth Orbit space-station mission.

    NASA crews have been lost only on the launch pad (Apollo I, training exercise), or at low-altitude boost phase (Challenger), or upon reentry (Columbia).

    Nobody has actually been endlessly lost in space, despite the Apollo mission's many opportunities to do so (Mission 13).

    The men that engineered that mission series, and who flew it (several times) are my heros.

    When people say "why can't we do that now?" I think to myself, "it's obvious" - we are simply not the men that they were.
    Last edited by bogeyman; 29 June 2009, 19:47.

    You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
      They had plenty of computing power in the brains of the very talented engineers with their slide rules and drafting tables. Modern computing power just makes the calculations, design, engineering manufacturing and drafting easier. The engineering principles and science are unchanged.
      Its a good job they didn't have windows - no doubt it would have given the blue screen of death or started a security download and reboot at the most inappropriate time.
      This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
        Mitch,

        I have huge admiration for the NASA guys of the 1960s.

        They were the guys who could just 'do stuff'. They could just make it happen. Real engineers of our dad's and granddad's generation. The guys with the right stuff
        beards.

        This is why I sport a proud beard, looking like a 60's computer scientist gives my clients confidence in my IT abilities
        You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Churchill View Post
          They did it because they didn't have masses of computing power, in fact they proved they didn't need it!
          Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
          They had plenty of computing power in the brains of the very talented engineers with their slide rules and drafting tables. Modern computing power just makes the calculations, design, engineering manufacturing and drafting easier. The engineering principles and science are unchanged.
          Thanks, that's what I meant.

          Originally posted by Amiga500 View Post
          beards.

          This is why I sport a proud beard, looking like a 60's computer scientist gives my clients confidence in my IT abilities
          You are Gordon Letwin and ICMFP!

          Mind you I heard that Grace had to shave twice a day...

          Comment


            #15
            Ummmmmmmm, what about

            The international space station
            The Shuttle
            The new Shuttle - in development
            The Hubble Space telescope
            The Large Binocular Telescope
            The LHC
            The Phoenix Mars Mission

            All of these have been achieved in the time since the Mercury and Apollo programmes.

            And the next generation will take our species to the edge of the solar system.

            We, as a species, are moving at the rate that is unsurpassed in known species development.

            Don't believe me, just think how annoying you find it waiting for your TomTom (other satnav systems available) to load up...........grrrrr. Now think about your Commodore 64 and how long that took to load donkey kong.

            Now that is progress.....
            Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death.

            Patience is something you admire in the driver behind you and scorn in the one ahead.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by BlackenedBiker View Post
              Ummmmmmmm, what about

              The international space station
              The Shuttle
              The new Shuttle - in development
              The Hubble Space telescope
              The Large Binocular Telescope
              The LHC
              The Phoenix Mars Mission

              All of these have been achieved in the time since the Mercury and Apollo programmes.

              And the next generation will take our species to the edge of the solar system.

              We, as a species, are moving at the rate that is unsurpassed in known species development.

              Don't believe me, just think how annoying you find it waiting for your TomTom (other satnav systems available) to load up...........grrrrr. Now think about your Commodore 64 and how long that took to load donkey kong.

              Now that is progress.....
              Have a chat with my mate Paulie, he wrote Freeload

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                Have a chat with my mate Paulie, he wrote Freeload
                Now that is progress, late 20th Century Software emulators rock!!!!!!

                Paulie should be working for NASA
                Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death.

                Patience is something you admire in the driver behind you and scorn in the one ahead.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Blackened Biker View Post
                  The new Shuttle - in development
                  Er, wot?

                  I thought they were going back to non-reusable capsules thingys. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but it's not a 'new shuttle'.
                  How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                  Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                  Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                  "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                  Comment


                    #19
                    India have a very advanced space programme.

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISRO

                    We all help to fund it.

                    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7198546.stm

                    Comment


                      #20
                      The Chinese space program should be interesting - moonbases and so forth.
                      Bored.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X