• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Unemployment higher than under Tories

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by snaw View Post
    1991, tories did it too
    Come again? We had a Tory gov in 91. Thatch changed the def at least once a year - oddly the figure on the new def was always lower

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
      Come again? We had a Tory gov in 91. Thatch changed the def at least once a year - oddly the figure on the new def was always lower
      Sorry that's what I was saying. Badly I admit ...

      But 1991 was a radical change, so much so that generally UK unemployment figures are measured before and after 1991.
      Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

      Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

      That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

      Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

      Comment


        #13
        The bottom line is that we are back to 1997 with unemployment expected to rise to 3-4 million by 2011, with a massive debt problem until 2032, pensions problem, immigration problem etc, and Labour said 'things can only get better'.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by expat View Post
          Here a litmus test of your prejudices:

          1. Tories come in, with unemployment at 1m.
          2. Mid-term, Tories have unemployment of 3m.
          3. At end, Tories have unemployment of 1m;
          Labour come in with unemployment of 1m.
          4. Mid-term, Labour have unemployment of 2m.

          Q: how do you describe that?
          (a) Labour unemployment higher than Tories
          or
          (b) Labour unemployment back to Tory levels
          or
          (c) Labour unemployment up, but not as high as Tory levels.
          What you seem to forget is that unemployment falls under labour because the state employs everyone, which usually results in the collapse of the UK economy which means the Tories then come in and have to make cuts.

          Which is why your statistics fail to tell the full story.
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by DSW View Post
            didn't they change how they measure unemployment, presumably to make it look less bad?
            Didnt they strip all the sickness beneficiaries out of the unempoyment numbers? Another million odd removed from the figures there.

            Mailman

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
              What you seem to forget is that unemployment falls under labour because the state employs everyone, which usually results in the collapse of the UK economy which means the Tories then come in and have to make cuts.

              Which is why your statistics fail to tell the full story.

              WHS !!!

              Comment


                #17
                DA, you're really keeping some bad company these days.
                Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

                Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

                That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

                Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                  If only smileys were literal.
                  ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by snaw View Post
                    DA, you're really keeping some bad company these days.
                    It is very worrying. I just wish you lot wouldnt wind him up and thus force me to explain him.
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
                      I'm not sure why the number of people out of work is so hilariously funny to him anyway.

                      Laughing about peoples misfortune isn't clever.

                      Gimp!
                      Figures bad for Labour, he scoffs at Labour.
                      Figures worse for Tories, he scoffs at Labour.
                      Millions out of work, he scoffs at Labour.

                      Loadsamoney!


                      (I think this captures the essential humanity of the character).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X