Originally posted by snaw
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Unemployment higher than under Tories
Collapse
X
-
Come again? We had a Tory gov in 91. Thatch changed the def at least once a year - oddly the figure on the new def was always lower -
Sorry that's what I was saying. Badly I admit ...Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostCome again? We had a Tory gov in 91. Thatch changed the def at least once a year - oddly the figure on the new def was always lower
But 1991 was a radical change, so much so that generally UK unemployment figures are measured before and after 1991.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
The bottom line is that we are back to 1997 with unemployment expected to rise to 3-4 million by 2011, with a massive debt problem until 2032, pensions problem, immigration problem etc, and Labour said 'things can only get better'.
Comment
-
What you seem to forget is that unemployment falls under labour because the state employs everyone, which usually results in the collapse of the UK economy which means the Tories then come in and have to make cuts.Originally posted by expat View PostHere a litmus test of your prejudices:
1. Tories come in, with unemployment at 1m.
2. Mid-term, Tories have unemployment of 3m.
3. At end, Tories have unemployment of 1m;
Labour come in with unemployment of 1m.
4. Mid-term, Labour have unemployment of 2m.
Q: how do you describe that?
(a) Labour unemployment higher than Tories
or
(b) Labour unemployment back to Tory levels
or
(c) Labour unemployment up, but not as high as Tory levels.
Which is why your statistics fail to tell the full story.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Didnt they strip all the sickness beneficiaries out of the unempoyment numbers? Another million odd removed from the figures there.Originally posted by DSW View Postdidn't they change how they measure unemployment, presumably to make it look less bad?
MailmanComment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhat you seem to forget is that unemployment falls under labour because the state employs everyone, which usually results in the collapse of the UK economy which means the Tories then come in and have to make cuts.
Which is why your statistics fail to tell the full story.
WHS !!!
Comment
-
DA, you're really keeping some bad company these days.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
If only smileys were literal.Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
It is very worrying. I just wish you lot wouldnt wind him up and thus force me to explain him.Originally posted by snaw View PostDA, you're really keeping some bad company these days.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Figures bad for Labour, he scoffs at Labour.Originally posted by cailin maith View PostI'm not sure why the number of people out of work is so hilariously funny to him anyway.
Laughing about peoples misfortune isn't clever.
Gimp!
Figures worse for Tories, he scoffs at Labour.
Millions out of work, he scoffs at Labour.
Loadsamoney!
(I think this captures the essential humanity of the character).Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42


Comment