-
Speaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on Twitter -
Curious. Given that the report specifically points out that Arcandor's troubles are not expected to affect Thomas Cook....how do you equate that with "Thomas Cook to go under"?Originally posted by MrMark View PostIs God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus -
He's posting on here between writing 'news' articles for the Sun.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
HTH.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
It's like a "Vote of confidence" from the Chairman...Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
Comment
-
It looks like Thomas Cook's actually quite a healthy company owned by a f**ked up hedge fund. Same has happened in Holland with Golden Tulip hotels; a good business that's now suffering because the owners used it as a vehicle for getting silly loans they can't repay.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You really think people will continue to book holidays with Thomas Cook under this cloud? Unfortunately psychology takes over (even with the insurance, no-one wants their holiday cancelled)... let's hope they survive this, but I fear for their short term future.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostSpeaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on TwitterComment
-
Comment