Originally posted by Board Game Geek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tyre sabotage brings race to halt
Collapse
X
-
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostBuild more dedicated cycle tracks. Everyone benefits.
Where will the money come from? Err, how about using some the billions taken in fuel duty, road tax (rising to £400 a year for many cars soon) and showroom taxes.
Cycle paths are not really the issue here."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostNo tacks on road without bigoted idiots perhaps.
Not sure why I am laughing as its a very true answer.....Comment
-
It's about time the cyclists were hit with road tax
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
There's no point in building cycle lanes as most 'serious' cyclists see themselves as above using such things.
I have no objection to cyclists so long as they stick to the edge of the road and, most definitely, no riding side by side.
Is it 2001 again?
excuse meLast edited by Alf W; 18 May 2009, 08:47.Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
Originally posted by Alf W View PostThere's no point in building cycle lanes as most 'serious' cyclists see themselves as above using such things.
I have no objection to cyclists so long as they stick to the edge of the road and, most definitely, no riding side by side.
Is it 2001 again?
Secondly, you obviously object to the highway code too - seeing as it's perfectly permissible for cyclists to ride two abreast should conditions permit.
I'll agree it's not a great idea on the A316 (or similar) but there's a cycle path along the side of that road anyway..."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Alf W View PostThere's no point in building cycle lanes as most 'serious' cyclists see themselves as above using such things.
I have no objection to cyclists so long as they stick to the edge of the road and, most definitely, no riding side by side.
Is it 2001 again?
We should build lots of cycle paths.
We should allow serious cyclists to use the roads, but they should be subject to the same rules and restrictions as the rest of us. Pass a test, carry insurance and nominal road tax.
I do not think bikes are a safe mix with either road traffic or pedestrians. The not so serious cyclist is under severe threat on the road and the serious are a threat to pedestrians when not.
Allow accompanied children to cycle on the footpaths.
This tack throwing incident is disgraceful. I do have some sympathy with the residents, but action like this is well beyond reasonable protest. Though if I hear of another critical mass protest I might do similar.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostI think we should have a compromise.
We should build lots of cycle paths.
We should allow serious cyclists to use the roads, but they should be subject to the same rules and restrictions as the rest of us. Pass a test, carry insurance and nominal road tax.
I do not think bikes are a safe mix with either road traffic or pedestrians. The not so serious cyclist is under severe threat on the road and the serious are a threat to pedestrians when not.
Allow accompanied children to cycle on the footpaths.
This tack throwing incident is disgraceful. I do have some sympathy with the residents, but action like this is well beyond reasonable protest. Though if I hear of another critical mass protest I might do similar.
Critical Mass:
The London Mass meets at 6.00pm on the last Friday of every month on the South Bank under Waterloo Bridge, by the National Film Theatre."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostAre you going to stop horses using the roads too?
Critical Mass:
Go and have a go if you think you're hard enough
Typical cyclist attitude on show ther MM. Seem to think that cyclists have the right to do whatever they please and sod everyone else.
I live in an area where horses are often on the road and generally there is no issue. Unlike cyclists riders tend to allow for the fact that there are other road users.
As a biker I would like to see them forced to clean up if the horse tulips though.
I would ban those pikey trotting buggies though.
edit: If I am around I may pop by.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostWhere did I say I wanted to stop cyclists using the road? I want to provide safe circumstances for all.
You go on to suggest that I would need a licence (as a cyclist) to use the road where there isn't a cycle path - would you extend this to all other road users (pedestrians, horse riders spring to mind immediately, but I'm sure there are other interest groups) ?
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostTypical cyclist attitude on show ther MM. Seem to think that cyclists have the right to do whatever they please and sod everyone else.
FWIW, I drive and ride a push bike. I like to think I don't fall in the ignorant subset of either group, but that is obviously subjective."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment