Originally posted by BrollyBonce
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Quick Brain Teaser
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BrollyBonce View PostToo easy
The Golden Ratio.

holy mackeral - now I am frightened
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Not much interest in trying to solve it but here is the answer.Originally posted by conned tractor View PostHere is a harder one:
1, 2, 1.5, 1.666, 1.6...
Bonus points for additional info especially on where it converges. And yes it is a real sequence.
If you take the fibinacci series, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21.... a natural solution to many problems, something like multiplying rabbits or something like that, can't remember an example.
Then take the ratio of consecutive numbers in this series, i.e., 1/1, 2/1, 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, 13/8....this gives the sequence shown. it converges to what is known as the golden number which is 1.618....
Now the golden number is used many times throughout history and in nature, the ancient greeks used to build important buidings to the ratio as it was considered to be the most aesthetically pleasing ratio for a rectangle. Whereby the width was, for example, 1.618 * height. Thus the height was 1/1.618 * width, 1/1.618 being 0.618.
It is also a root of the quadratic x^2 - x - 1. The other root being the exact inverse of this, i.e. 1.618 = 1/0.618 which as shown is also the reciprical.
Also, some sea shells and certain proportions of humans exhibit the proportionality from what I can remember. Anyway, there are much more details here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
Tractor.Comment
-
-
A slightly harder question
In the context of the first question in this thread, what is the significance of the number:
0.6180339887498949......Comment
-
qué?Originally posted by Churchill View PostOi fuqwit, you're too late!
I say, "You're too late!!!"Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes I know, I posted the question, just giving a more complete answer for everyone. Been on the juice?Originally posted by Churchill View PostWe'd already done the "Golden Ratio" bit.

Comment
-
Nope, resting my liver before I go to Ireland for a wedding. Must be detoxing!Originally posted by conned tractor View PostYes I know, I posted the question, just giving a more complete answer for everyone. Been on the juice?
Btw, don't believe everything Wikipedia tells you.Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostNope, resting my liver before I go to Ireland for a wedding. Must be detoxing!
Btw, don't believe everything Wikipedia tells you.
Your own?
I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:20
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 00:23
- ‘Stable’ IT contractor demand moved near growth in February 2026 Mar 10 06:49
- What is a tax-efficient salary for 2026/27 as a limited company director? Mar 9 06:23
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Mar 6 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Mar 5 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45

Comment