Originally posted by BrollyBonce
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Quick Brain Teaser
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BrollyBonce View PostToo easy
The Golden Ratio.

holy mackeral - now I am frightened
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Not much interest in trying to solve it but here is the answer.Originally posted by conned tractor View PostHere is a harder one:
1, 2, 1.5, 1.666, 1.6...
Bonus points for additional info especially on where it converges. And yes it is a real sequence.
If you take the fibinacci series, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21.... a natural solution to many problems, something like multiplying rabbits or something like that, can't remember an example.
Then take the ratio of consecutive numbers in this series, i.e., 1/1, 2/1, 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, 13/8....this gives the sequence shown. it converges to what is known as the golden number which is 1.618....
Now the golden number is used many times throughout history and in nature, the ancient greeks used to build important buidings to the ratio as it was considered to be the most aesthetically pleasing ratio for a rectangle. Whereby the width was, for example, 1.618 * height. Thus the height was 1/1.618 * width, 1/1.618 being 0.618.
It is also a root of the quadratic x^2 - x - 1. The other root being the exact inverse of this, i.e. 1.618 = 1/0.618 which as shown is also the reciprical.
Also, some sea shells and certain proportions of humans exhibit the proportionality from what I can remember. Anyway, there are much more details here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
Tractor.Comment
-
-
A slightly harder question
In the context of the first question in this thread, what is the significance of the number:
0.6180339887498949......Comment
-
qué?Originally posted by Churchill View PostOi fuqwit, you're too late!
I say, "You're too late!!!"Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes I know, I posted the question, just giving a more complete answer for everyone. Been on the juice?Originally posted by Churchill View PostWe'd already done the "Golden Ratio" bit.

Comment
-
Nope, resting my liver before I go to Ireland for a wedding. Must be detoxing!Originally posted by conned tractor View PostYes I know, I posted the question, just giving a more complete answer for everyone. Been on the juice?
Btw, don't believe everything Wikipedia tells you.Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostNope, resting my liver before I go to Ireland for a wedding. Must be detoxing!
Btw, don't believe everything Wikipedia tells you.
Your own?
I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment