• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Boring work related problem

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    you could 'twin' the tables up. Secondary (new) table with the same PK and new fields

    how long have you got if she gets her way ?
    Can't do that unfortunately. Metastorm BPM is a workflow engine come screen designer tool (and much more besides but still) and for a given workflow there is only one table. All data entry forms are based on this table. Any twinned tables would not connect to the form.

    I can however split the workflow up into multiple processes and design it all properly, but that's kind of where I am now :-(
    Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

    Comment


      #12
      Just write an email saying the table cannot handle more columns. Then add the columns anyway.

      You're a contractor. Don't get involved in office politics, just invoice for the days you've worked and be happy.
      Cats are evil.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
        I'm be tempted to put these concerns in an email and ensure that it reaches the appropriate people.

        As contractor you can take one of these routes:
        1) Do the job you're told to do, and not give a tulipe about anything
        2) Provide the benefit of your insight and experience, and advise on the best solution possible. Having said that, budgets are always a factor to consider.
        Just a little re-write:
        ....Provide/offer the benefit of your insight and experience, and provide your advice on possible solutions make sure this advice is documented (even if only via an EMail) and is given to the appropriate people then do the job you're paid to do (and not give a tulipe about anything else).

        Edit: Swamp obviously types faster than me!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
          Can't do that unfortunately. Metastorm BPM is a workflow engine come screen designer tool (and much more besides but still) and for a given workflow there is only one table. All data entry forms are based on this table. Any twinned tables would not connect to the form.

          I can however split the workflow up into multiple processes and design it all properly, but that's kind of where I am now :-(
          jeez, bound forms.


          so the tables need normalizing and they dont have the time ? excel is too good for them



          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #15
            That's a classic case of weak/ineffective/non-existent Project Management.

            As a PM I would get your advice as the technical expert, arrange a meeting with the customer and present the technical and real cost/time cases, I'd probably drag you into the meeting too depending on how good you are at translating tech into English.

            The PM needs to make rational recommendations to the customer and customer needs to make a decision. The recommendations should be one of 3 choices with cost estimates and impacts

            1. Rewrite
            2. Bodge it as requested with risks of failure highlighted and longer term repercussions
            3. Close project

            That's the approach I would take anyway based on the summary info you've presented.

            Comment


              #16
              I just do what the client asks me to do
              I will be long gone before the tulip hits the fan

              Comment


                #17
                I think the bodge it and bugger it approach is somewhat limiting when it comes to references. Also does give contractors a bad name.
                Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
                  That's a classic case of weak/ineffective/non-existent Project Management.

                  As a PM I would get your advice as the technical expert, arrange a meeting with the customer and present the technical and real cost/time cases, I'd probably drag you into the meeting too depending on how good you are at translating tech into English.

                  The PM needs to make rational recommendations to the customer and customer needs to make a decision. The recommendations should be one of 3 choices with cost estimates and impacts

                  1. Rewrite
                  2. Bodge it as requested with risks of failure highlighted and longer term repercussions
                  3. Close project

                  That's the approach I would take anyway based on the summary info you've presented.
                  I went to the big boss. I explained what trouble the project is in, the bad habits in the design practices (Ie fag packet design approach) and asked if I was here to sort it out, or just bodge and run.

                  He was clear in that I was an expensive resource, and they were paying the money for the benefit of my experience. He is going to advise the PM of this.

                  PM will now love me I'm sure. Had to be done IMHO.
                  Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
                    I went to the big boss. I explained what trouble the project is in, the bad habits in the design practices (Ie fag packet design approach) and asked if I was here to sort it out, or just bodge and run.

                    He was clear in that I was an expensive resource, and they were paying the money for the benefit of my experience. He is going to advise the PM of this.

                    PM will now love me I'm sure. Had to be done IMHO.
                    You might have said goodbye to the shag as well.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
                      I went to the big boss. I explained what trouble the project is in, the bad habits in the design practices (Ie fag packet design approach) and asked if I was here to sort it out, or just bodge and run.

                      He was clear in that I was an expensive resource, and they were paying the money for the benefit of my experience. He is going to advise the PM of this.

                      PM will now love me I'm sure. Had to be done IMHO.
                      Can't you replace with a normalisation, view, trigger and stored proc?
                      "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


                      Thomas Jefferson

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X