• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

conservative MP denounces Uk police state

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    So you think the police have the right to make up laws and tell people they can't take photographs of our architecture?
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/ap...tourist-photos

    How many people with German sounding accents have terrorised this country in the last 20 years?

    Oh and don't forget you are now legally not allowed to take a photograph of a policeman whether you are a foreign tourist, spending your money in this country, or normal citizen.
    I bet if a muslim in a bhurka took photos, the police would be too scared to delete the photos under politically correct hysteria rules.
    'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
    Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      So you think the police have the right to make up laws and tell people they can't take photographs of our architecture?
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/ap...tourist-photos

      How many people with German sounding accents have terrorised this country in the last 20 years?

      Oh and don't forget you are now legally not allowed to take a photograph of a policeman whether you are a foreign tourist, spending your money in this country, or normal citizen.
      I'm sure you believe it because it's in a paper. However, the police do have the right to restrict or monitor photography in reasonable circumstances.

      So not getting onto the point if they were maybe a little bit over the top, they did have the power to delete those photographs. I ask you this though. If it had been two muslim tourists from Pakistan with big flowing beards taking photos of the London transport system do you think there would have been a huge outcry?
      "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

      On them! On them! They fail!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        So people from other countries shouldn't be entitled to hold and express an opinion?

        That's not very British at all.
        Not at all, but if people from other countries take great delight in stating how much of a failed state this country is then I'm quite happy to show them the way to the airport so they can go back to their own shining light of a society. I mean, if our country’s so bad why stay?
        "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

        On them! On them! They fail!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Incognito View Post
          Not at all, but if people from other countries take great delight in stating how much of a failed state this country is then I'm quite happy to show them the way to the airport so they can go back to their own shining light of a society. I mean, if our country’s so bad why stay?
          With naive idiots like you living here, it is indeed a very good question.
          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
            With naive idiots like you living here, it is indeed a very good question.
            Naive? Hah. I really am not naive pal. I guarantee you I am far more street wise than you.

            Idiot? Well I suppose that's subjective isn't it. You're welcome to your opinion.
            "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

            On them! On them! They fail!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Incognito View Post
              Naive? Hah. I really am not naive pal. I guarantee you I am far more street wise than you.

              Idiot? Well I suppose that's subjective isn't it. You're welcome to your opinion.
              ....and I rather suspect I am not the only one who holds it.
              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
                ....and I rather suspect I am not the only one who holds it.
                Doesn't bother me, I'm not on this site to win friends and influence people.

                I do refer you to that saying though:

                'It is a general rule that the person who resorts to insults is the one losing the logical argument.'
                "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                On them! On them! They fail!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Incognito View Post
                  Doesn't bother me, I'm not on this site to win friends and influence people.

                  I do refer you to that saying though:

                  'It is a general rule that the person who resorts to insults is the one losing the logical argument.'

                  It's a shame that you don't adhere to that rule yourself instead of losing your rag every time somebody disagrees with you.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
                    I bet if a muslim in a bhurka took photos, the police would be too scared to delete the photos under politically correct hysteria rules.
                    That's a nice and easy one to test. Buy an old bhurka off Ebay and take a trip up to whitehall for some photography. I'm benching at the moment so can afford a short spell inside

                    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Long-black-yem...3286.m63.l1177
                    Only £20

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                      It's a shame that you don't adhere to that rule yourself instead of losing your rag every time somebody disagrees with you.
                      It wasn’t a disagreement. You're a repugnant little **** who came on baiting people from Liverpool who quite clearly were upset after the Hillsborough memorial. Some things are off limits.
                      "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                      On them! On them! They fail!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X