• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How to fix the monarchy

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #id
    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    Ooh, it's like Saudi Arabia, innit. You can't go round with bare arms there, either.

    Given the history of the Sikhs, I shouldn't worry one little bit about them being a threat to us in Britain. And tarring them with the 'all Asians are terrorists' is even more offensive than usual.

    I know generalising is dangerous, but there are not many races that can say they have earned the right to be in England. Since the Normans there's been the Vikings / Danes (by conquest or purchase); the Scots, Welsh and Irish (who stood there in red coats and died for us); the Poles earned their place here (in WWII dying in our merchant ships and aircraft); the ANZACs (who stopped the German machine gun bullets for no good reason for us); and the Sikhs allowed us to keep the Jewel in the Crown and, therefore, the Empire. There are others, but you should get the point.

    And if there's to be a punch up between anyone and the Sikhs, I'll be standing behind the Sikhs, holding their coats.
    Danes/Vikings were before the Normans, King Canute of England was aka King Knud of Denmark, and a large section of his army used in the siege of London were Polish, but don't let historical accuracy get in the way of a good rant.
    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

    Comment


      #id
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      I have a question. Did any of the authors of the "New Testament" even meet Jesus?
      I dont believe they did. I am positive that the author of the gospel of Matthew was not the apostle Matthew.

      I think the earliest gospel was written abot 50 years after Jesus died?

      It all adds to the requirement for faith!

      Comment


        #id
        Originally posted by threaded View Post
        ... don't let ... accuracy get in the way of a good rant.


        Sums up forums in general, really, dunnit?
        Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.

        Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard points

        Comment

        Working...
        X