• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How to fix the monarchy

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    Ooh, it's like Saudi Arabia, innit. You can't go round with bare arms there, either.

    Given the history of the Sikhs, I shouldn't worry one little bit about them being a threat to us in Britain. And tarring them with the 'all Asians are terrorists' is even more offensive than usual.

    I know generalising is dangerous, but there are not many races that can say they have earned the right to be in England. Since the Normans there's been the Vikings / Danes (by conquest or purchase); the Scots, Welsh and Irish (who stood there in red coats and died for us); the Poles earned their place here (in WWII dying in our merchant ships and aircraft); the ANZACs (who stopped the German machine gun bullets for no good reason for us); and the Sikhs allowed us to keep the Jewel in the Crown and, therefore, the Empire. There are others, but you should get the point.

    And if there's to be a punch up between anyone and the Sikhs, I'll be standing behind the Sikhs, holding their coats.
    Danes/Vikings were before the Normans, King Canute of England was aka King Knud of Denmark, and a large section of his army used in the siege of London were Polish, but don't let historical accuracy get in the way of a good rant.
    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      I have a question. Did any of the authors of the "New Testament" even meet Jesus?
      I dont believe they did. I am positive that the author of the gospel of Matthew was not the apostle Matthew.

      I think the earliest gospel was written abot 50 years after Jesus died?

      It all adds to the requirement for faith!

      Comment


        Originally posted by threaded View Post
        ... don't let ... accuracy get in the way of a good rant.


        Sums up forums in general, really, dunnit?
        Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.

        Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard points

        Comment

        Working...
        X