Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I like this man
Collapse
X
-
-
And I still want a definitive ruling on Angloromani.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNo. You decided by some criteria some languages are 'indigenous'. You tell us how you define 'indigenous'.Comment
-
you've denied indigenousOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNo. You decided by some criteria some languages are 'indigenous'. You tell us how you define 'indigenous'.
presumably therefore you have no problem with colonisation as there's no such thing as indigenous in your fantasy worldComment
-
Is that a sentence?Originally posted by contractor79 View Postyou've denied indigenousAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
There's no such thing as logic in your fantasy world. You equate language with culture.Originally posted by contractor79 View Postyou've denied indigenous
presumably therefore you have no problem with colonisation as there's no such thing as indigenous in your fantasy world
Now your punctuation has slipped as well, so what kind of example does that set to non-native speakers.Comment
-
conclusion is that by denying an indigenous people/culture you are in effect not opposing any colonisation as you'd deny that there's no indigenous people/culture to replace
people with certain political and religious views want to dismantle the idea of nationhood, indigenous people and cultures so that they can impose their globalist ideologiesComment
-
Can you learn at least one of either punctuation or logical reasoning?Originally posted by contractor79 View Postconclusion is that by denying an indigenous people/culture you are in effect not opposing any colonisation as you'd deny that there's no indigenous people/culture to replace
people with certain political and religious views want to dismantle the idea of nationhood, indigenous people and cultures so that they can impose their globalist ideologiesComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
This is a good troll. OK which of you invented this one?Originally posted by contractor79 View Postconclusion is that by denying an indigenous people/culture you are in effect not opposing any colonisation as you'd deny that there's no indigenous people/culture to replace
people with certain political and religious views want to dismantle the idea of nationhood, indigenous people and cultures so that they can impose their globalist ideologies
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment