I heard her say in an interview, the court of pubic opinion was against it (pay award) therefore she would have to legislate. IIRC public opinion favours bringing back hanging, surely if we are having law by witchhunt, we might as well bring back hanging.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sir Fred & Retrospective Legislation
Collapse
X
-
The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.” -
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostI heard her say in an interview, the court of pubic opinion was against it (pay award) therefore she would have to legislate. IIRC public opinion favours bringing back hanging, surely if we are having law by witchhunt, we might as well bring back hanging.
It was a spectacularly stupid thing to say, and hopefully she'll get hung out to dry for it at some point in the future."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostSurely Ratewhore is right though. The government agreed his severance terms.
I used to be all for blocking Fred's pension. Amazingly I've switched sides thanks to the behaviour of this government.
There seems to be a dispute as to whether this pension was properly agreed, so we will have to let a court decide that.
What I would really like to see is the massive past bonuses challenged and clawed back, because the bonuses should be based on good performance and not on granting of self-certificated badly secured loans to people/companies that had no prospect of being repaid.Comment
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostI heard her say in an interview, the court of pubic opinion was against it (pay award) therefore she would have to legislate. IIRC public opinion favours bringing back hanging, surely if we are having law by witchhunt, we might as well bring back hanging.
Incidentally, I took this from a comment in the Telegraph. I think it hits the nail firmly and squarely on the head in relation to the one-eyed scottish idiot:
The fact he makes noises as though he believes he or this country has a future is just an expression of his megalomania.Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostWhat the hell for? Being crap at his job?
During the boom times, he actually made a profit at the bank, which is more than can be said for the time Gordo was at the helm.
I don't see Gordo giving up his £3000 a week pension!!!
... but it was high-risk short-term profit to earn massive staff bonuses leading to long-term bust. The demise of RBS has taken place over almost a decade, not just the past year. The profits papered over long-term cracks which we are all now paying for.
Brown's strategy was basically the same, in that he had no thought for the future ramifications of his policies. IE: Spend now, pay later !!Comment
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostYes, a somewhat inconvenient truth. Can't blame the current incumbents entirely. Much as I'd like to.
I hate Labour : but would rather they were replaced with something better. Where is Maggie?Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostTo quote from ratewhore the Tories would be no different.Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostTo quote from ratewhore the Tories would be no different.
I hate Labour : but would rather they were replaced with something better. Where is Maggie?
Yep, we may as well keep Labour and let them continue spending and wasting as the Tories would do anyway. Let them sort out their own mess.Comment
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View PostYep, we may as well keep Labour and let them continue spending and wasting as the Tories would do anyway. Let them sort out their own mess.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostIMO its a pity that a vote for anything other than Labour/Conservative is wasted.
It makes sense to continue voting Labour because they have not had enough time to rectify the problems that they have caused.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment