Originally posted by threaded
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
David Davies made an average speech today
Collapse
X
-
-
You concentrate on the negative, what about Blairs legacy: the liberation of Iraq, the war on poverty, action on climate change, a strong period of sustained economic growth. Want to go back to Norman Lamont and the boom/bust cycle ? John Major sh*gging Edwina Currie ? Margaret Thatcher.
Oh no, we need more socialism, free and fast hospital treatment. State schools, more government, higher taxes. Especially for those high earning tax dodgers who steal money from the poor to snort up their noses. Oh yes, oh yes.Comment
-
I'll have a pint of what Jabber's drinking please...Oh Jesus - Disaster Management Ltd.
You know you'll need us!Comment
-
Originally posted by JabberwockyYou concentrate on the negative, what about Blairs legacy: the liberation of Iraq, the war on poverty, action on climate change, a strong period of sustained economic growth. Want to go back to Norman Lamont and the boom/bust cycle ? John Major sh*gging Edwina Currie ? Margaret Thatcher.
.
Hardly a period of strong economic growth in my book.
And now for the bust ... you dont need a crystal ball to see that coming.
The Liberation of Iraq ... well , what have you been smoking boyo ????
Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 5 October 2005, 12:46.Comment
-
AJP you need to educate yourself on the definition of boom and bust. A boom is a period of sustained growth in GDP, whereas a bust is well see for your self:
Comment
-
Lets have bigger busts then JW.
Still lets see the shape of Blairs Britain in say one years time from now, I predict much wailing and a considerable gnashing of teeth ...
Comment
-
Cameron is too young, Clarke is the best, but the guy who will win will have to have backing of Thatcher, apparently.Comment
-
Action on climate change
Originally posted by JabberwockyYou concentrate on the negative, what about Blairs legacy: the liberation of Iraq, the war on poverty, action on climate change, a strong period of sustained economic growth. Want to go back to Norman Lamont and the boom/bust cycle ? John Major sh*gging Edwina Currie ? Margaret Thatcher.
1. Blair sent that idiot Prescott to represent the UK at the international climate conferences. Would you?
2. Blair agreed to everything demanded at Kyoto, leaving the USA as the only country that had to make significant cuts. If you were Clinton or Bush, would you sign up to that?
3. Blair has discovered since Kyoto that the UK cannot even achieve its own small targets (God knows how the americans were supposed to manage), so Blair unilaterally changed the UK target to something easier.
4. Blair's only interest in alternative energy sources seems to be (a) sticking inefficient windmills everywhere over the countryside and (b) decommissioning our far more efficient nuclear power stations.
5. Blair spends more time flying around than any other major leader bar Bush, and far more than any other British prime minister before him. With air travel pinpointed as a major contributor to air polution, that isn't the kind of example to set. Perhaps he could spend a bit more time in the UK.
In summary, he has been fecking useless.Comment
-
Originally posted by stackpole2. Blair agreed to everything demanded at Kyoto, leaving the USA as the only country that had to make significant cuts. If you were Clinton or Bush, would you sign up to that?
In all fairness just look at typical US cars -- huge inefficient engines that don't even use diesel, I mean here 10-15 mpg would be made by M5 of which there will be made 1-5k, but in the USA 10-15 mpg is like typical car!
I am all for progress even if it hits environment, but using crap technology that wastes AND pollutes so much is just not right.Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBatesCameron....
No chance, looks like a stuck up snob.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Today 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Yesterday 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
Comment