• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Do large corporations really work?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by realityhack View Post
    I think it boils down to 'Do large corporations really work?' For who? The shareholders or the end customers/users? There are few companies that please both.
    I think that is why some companies delist from the stock market and go private again - so that they can focus on the long term.
    This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      a good local carpenter could put something together at a sensible price.
      I wish - tried that at our last house but it was sooooo expensive we just bought flat pack.
      This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by Not So Wise View Post
        Large Corps don't really work because what's "important" is generally reversed from small companies

        Large Corp Priority list (in order)
        • Individual - Promotion/pay rises
        • Department - Budget/politics
        • Region (If large enough) - politics
        • Product
        • Company


        And that list is pretty fixed, it's vary rare for something lower in the list to put ahead of something higher for "the good of the company"

        Small Company list is virtually reversed
        • Product
        • Company
        • Department
        • Individual


        And unlike the Corp list this one can be pretty fluid


        Only reason large corps exist is because they start out as small companies, do well and get enough market share to maintain their profit margins when everything goes down hill due to the transition from small company to Corporation and the accountants take over

        Bank's fiasco though was slightly different though, while the normal Corp priority list went into force, the accountant's either shut up or got fired

        Funny who knew, accountants actually do some good
        This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

        Comment


          #54
          Just to through a spanner in the works, there is no reason why mass-manufactured, flat-pack furniture can't be stronger and more durable than a bespoke crafted piece. With decent production you can create 1000 tables that are exactly the same, and just because you use modern techniques to construct/assemble the flat-pack doesn't make it intrinsically weak.

          I don't know if there is such a thing - high-quality mass-manufactured - but it could still be much cheaper... the one thing it can't give is the aesthetic/art quality. But if you only want something with decent build quality, this wouldn't be your main factor as long as it's got a little attractiveness - screws hidden underneath for instance.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by realityhack View Post
            I think it boils down to 'Do large corporations really work?' For who? The shareholders or the end customers/users? There are few companies that please both.
            Large corporations exist purely to make money for shareholders (and once you get your head round that fact, everything else slots into place). If in order to do that they have to please their customers then they will. But they will only please their customers as much as they have to, because doing that invariably costs money...and I am sure we can all think of numerous examples of companies who couldn't give two hoots about their customers for that reason.

            There is a fascinating academic paper knocking about that hypothesises and discusses that the shareholder model is destined to change, with greater balance against leveraging and employee/customer reliance. I'll dig it out and send the link in case anyone is interested.
            Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

            Comment

            Working...
            X