• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

UK Civil Liberties: RIP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    So, what can we do about this?

    Comment


      #32
      ter·ror·ism
      Pronunciation: \'ter-er-i-zm\
      Function: noun
      Date: 1795
      : the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
      — ter·ror·ist \-er-ist\ adjective or noun
      — ter·ror·is·tic \'ter-er-is-tik\ adjective
      See:
      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism

      Odd definition. Sounds like activiteis of HMG?

      Now I'll probably get busted for even doing that internet search.
      Last edited by BlightyBoy; 17 February 2009, 11:28.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by BlightyBoy View Post
        See:
        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism

        Odd definition. Sounds like activiteis of the HMG?

        Now I'll probably get busted for even doing that internet search.
        Oh, yes. It certainly "could be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism".

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by realityhack View Post
          So, what can we do about this?
          Not enough people give a sh1t. Too busy getting on with their lives and drinking Victory Gin. Like everyone on here.

          Seriously, no-one on this site will do anything about it, and we are more aware than most, so what hope is there for Mrs Chav to get off her @rse.

          And even if there were enough people kicking up a stink, the government would make the right noises then kick it into the long grass.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
            Not enough people give a tulip. Too busy getting on with their lives and drinking Victory Gin. Like everyone on here.

            Seriously, no-one on this site will do anything about it, and we are more aware than most, so what hope is there for Mrs Chav to get off her @rse.

            And even if there were enough people kicking up a stink, the government would make the right noises then kick it into the long grass.
            <sigh>

            All too true. But I'm game for taking a camera down to the houses of parliament or some such with 1000 others... could arrange a flash mob, perhaps.

            Comment


              #36
              As Elbow said...

              But the leaders of the free world
              Are just little boys throwing stones
              And it's easy to ignore
              Till they're knocking on the door of your homes
              "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


              Thomas Jefferson

              Comment


                #37
                Another step to Big Brother
                Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
                  Another step to Big Brother
                  committed to providing a safe environment in which to socialise.

                  "To this end, Islington police recommend all premises are required to install CCTV and make those images available to police upon request before a licence is granted."
                  **** that. Islington pubs off the list.

                  Indeed probably the Met Police area as a whole. And the whole of England probably.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Ipsi dixeunt


                    Home Office July 2008


                    The potential for surveillance of citizens in public spaces and private communications has increased to the extent that ours could be described as a surveillance society unless trust in the Government's intentions in relation to data and data sharing is maintained.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
                      I just thnk this reaction is a little OTT - the whole "stop and search" laws had people in uproar too, and I have never been stopped and searched like a "common criminal" yet - neither has anyone I know.
                      And that's probably way more likely than this dont you think?
                      I presume you're talking about the SuS law in the early 80's introduced by Thatcher? I was stopped a couple of times during this period but it was mainly young black people who were stopped by the police which led to the Brixton and St. Paul riots. The law was repealed in late '81 but really the burning question now is that during Thatcher's regime people would get off their arses and march (I remember going to many a rally in London where up to a million people would be there) yet now, no-one can be bothered to get off their fat arses? Is this due to society now being complacent, everything is handed to them on a plate or the British electorate is in fact in love with the current bunch of fools leading them off the cliffs like a bunch of lemmings?

                      WHOEVER PUTS HIS HAND ON ME TO GOVERN ME IS A USERPER AND A TYRANT, I DECLARE HIM MY ENEMY.
                      Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X