Where's Cybertory? He should be calling for Clarkson to be sacked by the 'bigoted BBC'... Oh hang on this suits his Tory agenda so it's ok.
Bloody hypocrite.
Bloody hypocrite.
-
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson -
Amidst complaints about BBC bias, Clarkson states an indiscutable fact based on empirical observation and gets slammed for it. He should be praised for his objective and factual statement.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
One-eyed: fact. Irrelevant.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
Scottish: fact. Irrelevant.
Idiot: Relevant. Opinion.
OK I praise the insightful anglo-binocular Clarkson for noting objectively and factually that Gordon Brown is one-eyed and Scottish.Comment
-
Idiot: fact.Originally posted by expat View Post
Anyway, how can this be more offensive to Scots than the fact that Gordon is a Scot?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
It makes me laugh that anyone at all can get angry about this!"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "
Thomas JeffersonComment
-
-
-
It's hiding under some snow.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Standing behind you with a glint in his eye and a big fckin club ...Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostHang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
Oh no it isn'tOriginally posted by snaw View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
Ken Clarkson
Comment