Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Why don't we talk and write like we used to ?
Collapse
X
-
-
Speak for yourself.Originally posted by Ravello View PostThat's a whole heap easier to understand than Chaucer.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You mean "spk4urself".Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostSpeak for yourself.
As a point of interest though, the vast majority of "text speak" is pretty easy to understand and works in much the same way as shorthand used to (i.e. omission of the vowels unless they start the word).
In addition to that, I recall reading an article recently regarding a debate about the evolution of the usage of English and, more specifically the spelling of words. The essence of the article was evolving towards the phonetic spelling of words in place of their "more confusing" current equivalent. Similar as to the gradual progression from Ye Olde Englishe..Proud owner of +5 Xeno Geek PointsComment
-
Is spellinge in a phonticke fashion perchance more evidence that the plebs are indeede as thicke as shytte?Originally posted by Ravello View PostYou mean "spk4urself".
As a point of interest though, the vast majority of "text speak" is pretty easy to understand and works in much the same way as shorthand used to (i.e. omission of the vowels unless they start the word).
In addition to that, I recall reading an article recently regarding a debate about the evolution of the usage of English and, more specifically the spelling of words. The essence of the article was evolving towards the phonetic spelling of words in place of their "more confusing" current equivalent. Similar as to the gradual progression from Ye Olde Englishe..And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!"
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought --
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
And, as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!
One, two! One, two! And through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment