Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
2 Minute MBA!
Collapse
X
-
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus -
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostNope, I'm not going to rise to the bait. Sorry.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIndeed. In essence, that’s actually correct, but making money continually over a period of many years involves a more developed way of thinking, involving an understanding of technology, the outside world, human relationships, social expectations and norms, political developments and so on and so on. A business which loses the goodwill of society is on the wrong course. ‘Society’ includes the customers of a business and the regulatory bodies who can wield power over a business and threaten it’s ability to earn profits.
I’ve started reading ‘The Puritan Gift’. It’s not about religion, but a fantastic book about the puritans who arrived in North America and built up their villages and businesses into highly successful organisations. The puritans believed that to be successful, a business should serve a useful purpose in society, should have and follow ideals, should involve skilled craftsmanship and should place decision making at the lowest possible level where people are qualified to make a judgment.
http://www.puritangift.com/book.html
The decline of this puritan organisational method came in the 50s and 60s with ‘scientific management’ and the rise of the MBAs; professional ‘managers’ who jump from one sector to another applying their primarily financial and statistical methods while having no knowledge of the sector or business concerned. The idea came about that someone who ran a biscuit manufacturer successfully would be just as successful at running a publisher or a bank.
Contrast this with the Rhineland style of management which involves many stakeholders in decision making; derided by US businesspeople for so long, but actually very successful in the long run.
Sod it, this is turning into one of those essays I wrote for my PGDip.
Milk and Cookies been keeping you awake ?
I read with interest the following :
The idea came about that someone who ran a biscuit manufacturer successfully would be just as successful at running a publisher or a bank.
Yet did not the former CIO of IBM Lou Gestner join IBM from BNabisco biscuit company and then turned IBM from near bankruptcy to pole position circa 95 n the IT World ?Comment
-
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostYet did not the former CIO of IBM Lou Gestner join IBM from BNabisco biscuit company and then turned IBM from near bankruptcy to pole position circa 95 n the IT World ?Comment
-
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostVery intersting observations M.
Milk and Cookies been keeping you awake ?
I read with interest the following :
The idea came about that someone who ran a biscuit manufacturer successfully would be just as successful at running a publisher or a bank.
Yet did not the former CIO of IBM Lou Gestner join IBM from BNabisco biscuit company and then turned IBM from near bankruptcy to pole position circa 95 n the IT World ?
I also somewhat object to the idea that a business 'makes money'. You can't 'make' money, you can only 'make' utility or add value. If you nail some planks together to make a table, you've made something useful for which someone will hopefully pay. They pay for the utility that the table provides and you act of adding value to the timber. A trader who breaks up a large production batch into small packages that the customers need adds vlue and makes utility for both supplier, who wants to produce efficently, and buyer who needs only a certain amount.
But herein lies the problem; recently people thought you could actually 'make' money without adding value or creating utility but simply by betting on other people trying to 'make' money.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostBut herein lies the problem; recently people thought you could actually 'make' money without adding value or creating utility but simply by betting on other people trying to 'make' money.This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
-
Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View PostSo what do bookies do?
Unfortunately bankers started doing pretty much the same thing.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThe day I meet a truly intelligent person with an MBA I'll stop ripping the piss out of them. Maybe that's you. I rather liked your earlier observation that the problem lies in the idea that a business exists purely to make money. I just wish some of the other MBAs I meet would start to view business in a more developed and intelligent way.
But to call holders of MBAs unintelligent is very disingenuous - any postgraduate degree requires a high degree of intelligence. I'll grant you that most of them have their head up their backside - but that trait certainly isn't limited just to people who hold MBA'sIs God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - EpicurusComment
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostThe problem isn't the MBA per se (depending on where you do it of course), the problem is the people doing them. I did mine purely to gain knowledge and to learn what my clients were talking about and where they were coming from - most people do them as a career step ladder. The problem with that is they come off the course thinking they are god's gift, whereas all they have done is akin to a carpenter buying a saw. It's what you do with it that is important, not the fact that you have one.
But to call holders of MBAs unintelligent is very disingenuous - any postgraduate degree requires a high degree of intelligence. I'll grant you that most of them have their head up their backside - but that trait certainly isn't limited just to people who hold MBA's
Maybe the MBA could be more credible if it was turned into a professional qualification with a continuous education requirement, so that the idiots who give it a bad name can be weeded out?
I really think the MBA is in danger of losing credibility among highly educated people. That would not be a good thing; I think it's important to have management education, but perhaps it's time to take some new steps beyond the conventional MBA.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 28 January 2009, 15:57.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostHow about the ability to seek out creative approaches to solving problems instead of the knee-jerk approaches that too many senior managers take?This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment