• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

This recession demands that we employ logic and spend our way out of it

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    That would lead to massive fraud with people administering deliberately undervalued assets overseas.
    My apologies, I forgot that we live in a corrupt-free and honest financial environment today.

    Comment


      #12
      In Scotland we still have a public water company unlike in England where they are all private, as you will know.

      English water may taste like tulip but it has less bacteria in it, the quality of our rivers and beaches is poor because we do less sewage treatment and still we pay much more for it also Scottish Water still gets subsidies from the tax payer.

      When it comes to private Vs public there really is no contest, private on the main produces higher quality for less cost.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
        My apologies, I forgot that we live in a corrupt-free and honest financial environment today.
        You're right, but there's no need to encourage even more fraud.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Solidec View Post
          Yes but i would rather have a train running 20% less efficiently if it was going to cost 50% less!

          Privatisation shifts the goal from providing service to generating profit, and with that comes exploitation of the customer base.
          Privatisation shifts from monopoly to competition, which in most cases benefits the customer. I moved my electricity and gas last year and saved quite a bit of money as a result.

          Sadly, the envisaged competition on railways hasn't materialised. As you suggest, it was probably a privatisation too far. However, I have no rose-tinted specs about what it was like before - the government were no better at running it and we had more strikes. Except it worked pretty well on Saturday mornings, when I went off to footy.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
            Sadly, the envisaged competition on railways hasn't materialised.
            Which is exactly the problem, and IMO wholly forseeable.. Competition arises through choice.. As a consumer I don't choose Thames Trains over Southwestern I use which ever company happens to be providing the service on the line/route that I require. I have no choice in this ergo there is no competition.
            Proud owner of +5 Xeno Geek Points

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Ravello View Post
              Which is exactly the problem, and IMO wholly forseeable.. Competition arises through choice.. As a consumer I don't choose Thames Trains over Southwestern I use which ever company happens to be providing the service on the line/route that I require. I have no choice in this ergo there is no competition.
              The Swiss railways run efficiently with no competition on mainlines and wile the main railway company is owned by the federal and regional governments.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment

              Working...
              X