Originally posted by Doggy Styles
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
150 quid difference
Collapse
X
-
No that is a magic poo. One where you know you have done it but it is nowhere to be seen. The best ones are those which leave no trace on the bog role either.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1! -
Originally posted by Pogle View PostNo sweetie, I am not an idiot. Obviously i didn't discuss the 1st agents rate with the second. I don't discuss other roles with agents.
And how do you know that the second agent is not pocketing the extra £150 a day? - providing the role actually exists, of course!
The higher rate is around the market rate for the job.
Yes you are an idiot. The second agent could now bad mouth you to the client.
Could say that they have worked with you in the past and you were unprofessional/trouble maker etcComment
-
So what would your answer be, that I let both represent me for the same job?Originally posted by Iron Condor View PostYes you are an idiot. The second agent could now bad mouth you to the client.
Could say that they have worked with you in the past and you were unprofessional/trouble maker etc
I would not knowingly do that as it is unprofessional and counter productive.
I have seen two agencies advertise the same non-existent roles before, this is nothing new.
"It gets worse. Agent 1 may not have even sent your CV. Common way of reducing competition by saying they are submitting you. You then tell all other agents you've already been submitted. Agent 1 then gets a free pass for his favoured candidate."
Its the way of the contracting world I'm afraid.I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012
Comment
-
So do you recommend letting the agent put you forward multiple times, then? Or just say that you're not interested in that particular role?Originally posted by Iron Condor View PostYes you are an idiot. The second agent could now bad mouth you to the client.
Could say that they have worked with you in the past and you were unprofessional/trouble maker etc
I've been rung twice this afternoon for the same role, which I spoke to an agent about yesterday. I've told the two agents this afternoon that I'm already in - I guessed the client based on the location, and that's as far as the chat went with each of them.Comment
-
Had the same thing yesterday and did the same as you.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostSo do you recommend letting the agent put you forward multiple times, then? Or just say that you're not interested in that particular role?
I've been rung twice this afternoon for the same role, which I spoke to an agent about yesterday. I've told the two agents this afternoon that I'm already in - I guessed the client based on the location, and that's as far as the chat went with each of them.
Multiple representation is not a good thing.Comment
-
look, there is no right answer to a situation like this, there are too many permutations. You just have to adopt a strategy and stick to itOriginally posted by Iron Condor View PostYes you are an idiot. The second agent could now bad mouth you to the client.
Could say that they have worked with you in the past and you were unprofessional/trouble maker etc
if it doesnt work, change it
nice beaver btw pogues
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
So you keep saying.....Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
nice beaver btw pogues

I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012
Comment
-
second thoughtsOriginally posted by Pogle View PostSo you keep saying.....
it could do with a shave
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Start on Monday
I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012
Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment