• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Installing SQL Virtual Machine

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by juststarting View Post
    mySQL ? I've heard that this buggy , feature-less , miserable sql-wannabe is indeed capable of pushing you off the edge.
    I've heard PostgreSQL is more sound than MySQL "under the hood", as it uses some abstract object layer, whereas with MySQL they simply pile in more and more functionality and then jump up and down on the lid to shut it prior to each new release!

    I also know, from personal experience, that MySQL is more likely to throw a wobbler and become corrupted under high loads (or was three years ago) [see first paragraph]
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
      I've heard PostgreSQL is more sound than MySQL "under the hood"
      PostgreSQL is a crock - I used it for 2 years until finally I got tired of bulltulip gradual slowdowns for no good reason (vacuum DB my - was taking forever), thrown it out and moved to MS SQL - works like a dream, never need to freaking vacuum it

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
        My November bill was about £58 quid for one machine instance running for the whole month, a couple of gig of data stored on S3, a gig or so of data in and out of EC2, a fixed IP address, and a fifty gig block storage device (aka drive).

        Currency rate fluctuations apply when converting from USD to GBP - I think my bill has gone up about ten quid over the last few months

        Of course one of the major advantages of EC2 is being able to scale both up and down on demand - if you get Slashdotted, for example, you'll have about 20,000 visitors in the first hour, gradually tailing off with a total of around 120,000 visitors over the first twenty-four hours - at least, that was what we saw when I Slashdotted a friend's site the other year

        An application doing a fair bit of work per request, as opposed to a static HTML page, would have trouble coping on just one server under that kind of load, but on EC2 you could just spin up a few more instances and load-balance across them, spinning them down as traffic tailed off - thus you only pay for what you need, even if you happen to need a hundred servers for just one hour.
        Amazing indeed. I take it I can have my own Windows network? With the ability to set up Domain Controllers, etc. I am gonna be loading Sharepoint and that needs Windows infrastructure with several servers that talk to each other on windows intranet tcp ports.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by juststarting View Post
          Amazing indeed. I take it I can have my own Windows network? With the ability to set up Domain Controllers, etc. I am gonna be loading Sharepoint and that needs Windows infrastructure with several servers that talk to each other on windows intranet tcp ports.
          I haven't used the Windows AMIs, but the tenth response in this thread on the EC2 forums suggests that you can build a network with a bit of messing around

          One of the available Windows Amazon Public Images probably offers a good starting point.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
            I've heard PostgreSQL is more sound than MySQL "under the hood", as it uses some abstract object layer, whereas with MySQL they simply pile in more and more functionality and then jump up and down on the lid to shut it prior to each new release!

            I also know, from personal experience, that MySQL is more likely to throw a wobbler and become corrupted under high loads (or was three years ago) [see first paragraph]

            I think it has improved vastly in the last couple of years. It did not even do nested queries until about 3 years ago. SUN buying it has been a big step up for them.

            I was always told PostgreSQL was a quality product but I thought it was a bag of tulip when I used it.

            Comment


              #16
              I am looking at using the EC2 for plan B, in fact I was just going to attempt to get my first AMI running in the next couple of days, I have installed g-eclipse, got my logon and picked my AMI. See how it goes.

              We expect the usage will go from zero to about a million hits a day ( hopefully ) then we will move to a physical server but the ability to move up the hosting plans during the volume rise will be massive for us.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                We expect the usage will go from zero to about a million hits a day


                Only if your app shows up civilian targets in Israel within effective Kassam radius

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post


                  Only if your app shows up civilian targets in Israel within effective Kassam radius
                  Israel will have it's own partition of the application so one million a day is actually a conservative estimate.

                  Bring on the google ad revenue.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    This sounds much like my week so far...a Microsoft (mainly!) nightmare. You'd think virtualising a small environment for a client would be a piece of cake - wrong!

                    Friday:
                    Spent installing Exchange 2007...even after the stated pre-req's were installed, the perpetual nagging from the "pre-setup tests" that "you need this update too" got me down & eventually left it installing & finished the job on the drive home via 3G & RDP!

                    Monday:
                    ISA Server! This installed fine until we put the clients webfilter on! It said it takes 60 meg of disk space, fine, got 5 gig free. Install it, server slows to a crawl & turns out the software is now downloading 4 gig of what it claims to be a filtering database. Cue lots of frantic service console action as I try to extend the disk....Another fine mess!

                    Today:
                    Coffee!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by juststarting View Post
                      You would think it be a quick one wouldn't you ? Well there I am , with all the experience and all , trying to install a VM with SQL 2005 .. taking 4 days now..

                      0. Installed a Widows 03 VM.

                      1. Tried installing SQL from my archive sources... all installs besides workstations components which throws an error.
                      ...
                      Now that is why I hate IT and the way Microsoft uses the world for debugging purposes. GO GOOGLE !
                      1. Is the windows virtual machine on the network? Then just connect to it from client components on an external machine.

                      2. Try installing client tools before installing SQL Server

                      3. Try a copy of the binn folder - might work

                      4. Have you got another virtual machine with SQL already installed on it? If so copy an image across to the new server (dirty but might do it).

                      5. Get on your knees and apologise to the server for mentioning google. And accept that it is your role in life is to test for Microsoft. Thought crime is a crime you know, and can be detected by SQL Server 2005.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X