Originally posted by Doggy Styles
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
£915 billion needed
Collapse
X
-
I am sure Tories would do the same, the only thing that would have been different is that they would have had lower taxes and lower public debts. That would have made the difference now. -
I read recently the amount which Blair is now creaming for his Gold Plated State Pension and the amount spent on his security alone - its too depressing to contemplate.
'Nuff said.Comment
-
Well to be fair, right wing america is in financial trouble because of left wing democratic policies and corruption.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostAye, but:
- Right wing America is in financial trouble too
MailmanComment
-
Good article on it in The Scotsman today..
linky
Mature and highly reasoned response from Unison..
"This is the CBI jumping on the back of the Tory party, back to their usual games. They are attacking public-sector pensions at a time when they should be addressing the real issues in the economy, which their members bear some responsibility for."
We should just let that fine chap run the country, he seems to have all the answers.Comment
-
I doubt the tories would have stopped supervising the banks in 2001, which allowed them to start running up their massive deficits with their wacko schemes.Where is the evidence for that?Originally posted by AtW View PostI am sure Tories would do the same...
Just to remind you what we are talking about, Brown took supervision away from the BoE, brought it under his control at the IFA, and they let go of the reins. We went from a situation where banks roughly balanced savings and lending, to today, where they have a £750 billion deficit.
Firstly there was no need to do it. Secondly the Tories were for smaller government, not larger.Comment
-
It's based on common sense that those in Govt would do anything to stay in power.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostWhere is the evidence for that?
Labour Govt for example did not look like they were going for labour principles at all - they just did what they had to stay in power for as long as possible.
Yes Brown did all that and maybe Tories would not do that.Just to remind you what we are talking about, Brown took supervision away from the BoE, brought it under his control at the IFA, and they let go of the reins. We went from a situation where banks roughly balanced savings and lending, to today, where they have a £750 billion deficit.
But I ask myself - would have Tories allowed (or stimulated) the same house debt bubble as Labour did? I am pretty sure Tories would have done the same. However they'd probably reduce taxes and state borrowing to pay off Govt debt (Brown took on lots of debt too), this overall would have made UK better positioned for this downturn, however I doubt very much Tories would not have inflated the housing bubble in this country.Comment
-
You assume politicians are somehow in a better position to judge economics than businessmen, whereas I wouldn't trust them to run a cake stall at a fete. IMHO independence of the BoE would make no difference, moreover the Tories are for deregulation not the converse.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostWhere is the evidence for that?
Just to remind you what we are talking about, Brown took supervision away from the BoE, brought it under his control at the IFA, and they let go of the reins. We went from a situation where banks roughly balanced savings and lending, to today, where they have a £750 billion deficit.
Firstly there was no need to do it. Secondly the Tories were for smaller government, not larger.
We would still be in bust mode now under the Tories, albeit not so much in debt, and Cybertory et al would be lauding the economic miracle of the housing boom, and the unfortunate coincidence of the "world wide recession"Last edited by Bagpuss; 15 December 2008, 13:34.The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
Half right.Originally posted by Mailman View PostWell to be fair, right wing america is in financial trouble because of left wing democratic policies and corruption.
Mailman
Clinton forced lenders to do 10% social lending, i.e. never get it back.
Bush gave great tax breaks to the rich, much more than the budget (his budget) could afford; then did the Iraq war too.
A plage from both their houses.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment