Originally posted by Board Game Geek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Got kids between 1986-2003?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by dang65 View PostWhere do you think all the people that serve you on a daily basis come from? From delivering your local paper or manning the tills at the petrol station to flying the plane you go on holiday in or supplying your gas and electricity. They were all children once.
How were they educated to a level where they could do their jobs? Who got them to school every day and paid for their school uniform, food and any number of other extras that come up every day when you're raising children?
The reward you get is the society around you, but you get it cheaper than the people that actually bother to have children do.
ooo nice comebackComment
-
Yeah, not having to look after kids is your reward.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostCase in point...spoke to a chap last night who had come back from his local. He was telling me about his mate's partner. She's got 17 children from 5 different fathers. (He's the fifth partner).
Suffice to say, the money they make from their children is no small amount, and allows them to live at the taxpayer's expense in their local every night.
Neither he nor his partner need to work.
We've got four children, and one has left home now (he's in the Royal Navy, which I guess you're subsidising too). So, standard Child Benefit which everyone gets adds up to 43.90 a week for the other three. We get free education, though one of mine is in an independent fee-paying school, and we get free dentist treatment but none of them have needed any work done so far. Free prescriptions, which they probably use once a year for the default GP issue full course of antibiotics for some harmless infection they've picked up.
The rest is paid for by us personally. Sure, it's our choice, but the benefit to society of a well brought up, well educated and healthy citizen for really very little public investment is obvious. Referring to parents as if they are leeches which you personally are subsidising seems to miss the point completely.Comment
-
These selfish childless couples should pay far more tax than selfless parents, who are acting as national benefactors.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Referring to parents as if they are leeches which you personally are subsidising
I'm looking at this in unemotive terms.
Going back to the original post, I was trying to point out that if there is free money being handed out to those who had offspring, why is there not free money to those who do not ?
It's purely conjecture to say "Ah but yes, my son/daughter may become a business leader, employer of people, doctor, nurse, carer, blah blah blah."
What is not conjecture is that aforesaid being is yet another mouth to feed, yet another consumer of public-funded services, yet another strain on society.
However, the Government see fit to apportion additional finances to support this being.
Therefore, why not reward those who choose to remain childless (or have fewer children), since by virtue they will not be burdening society more ?
Obviously once they hit 16 they can go and get a job (though I think some can work at a younger age under certain conditions), so they can start to self-support anyway.
It just seems at odds when people criticise the "Nanny State" in one breath, and yet take the State's money in the next for their wee bairns.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
To bring it back on topic.
Rushed (sort of) home yesterday to look up the details for 2002/3. Tax credit already given. Makes sense, I filled out the self-assessment form at the time and there was a tick-box for "do you have kids?"
So, I guess this only applies to people who are PAYE, have the wrong tax code and did not fill out a self-assessment form.
Can't imagine that applying to many people here.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment