• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Europe protects freedom of British

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I didn't exactly say that, it wouldn't get to court if there were not some circumstancial evidence, but that would not be enough without the DNA. Therefore you knew the guy was there, you knew his DNA was found about your sisters person but you would be unhappy if he was convicted by DNA obtained under a breach of his human rights?

    No, No, No.

    The point here (claim by plod) is that the perp wouldn't even be identified if they aren't allowed to keep "non convicted" DNA.

    Once you have got to the point of identifying your suspect, the DNA database is completely irrelevent. (as you can take new DNA from him/her now).

    Comment


      #32
      What the Government will do will be to extend ANY crime to be covered by mandatory DNA sampling. Get flashed for speeding or put the wrong waste into your dustbin and you will not only receive a letter with a fine in, but you will be told to report to your local cop-shop for a sample to be taken.

      All legal because you have broken the law and therefore not innocent and the vast majority of the country will be covered at some point.
      When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice - Ayn Rand, Atlas.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by expat View Post
        Bollocks. Why don't you start another identity and have him talk sense?

        Naaaah.
        It's the consensus viewpoint of many historians such as Dr Mike Ibeji you imbecile.

        HTH

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
          It's the consensus viewpoint of many historians such as Dr Mike Ibeji you imbecile.

          HTH
          I heard that he's got $12,000,000 inheritance money that he needs to transfer to the UK - if you can provide him with an account to facilitate the transfer there is 10% in it for you....
          "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


          Thomas Jefferson

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
            It's the consensus viewpoint of many historians such as Dr Mike Ibeji you imbecile.

            HTH
            Not such as Hobsbawm, Taylor, Trevelyan, Toynbee, Schama then?

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by expat View Post
              Not such as Hobsbawm, Taylor, Trevelyan, Toynbee, Schama then?
              From Schama's TV series, and from his book where he did a comparison of the french and english peasantry pre-revolution, I got the impression he followed that viewpoint too.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
                From Schama's TV series, and from his book where he did a comparison of the french and english peasantry pre-revolution, I got the impression he followed that viewpoint too.
                You would get that impression, Ibeji produced it.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Changing the subject slightly, what's the chances some techie who has access to this DNA data will be copying it across to a memory stick (or 5) and flogging it to a private company for ad-hoc tests.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
                    Changing the subject slightly, what's the chances some techie who has access to this DNA data will be copying it across to a memory stick (or 5) and flogging it to a private company for ad-hoc tests.
                    leaving the memory stick on the train
                    Best Forum Advisor 2014
                    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
                      Changing the subject slightly, what's the chances some techie who has access to this DNA data will be copying it across to a memory stick (or 5) and flogging it to a private company for ad-hoc tests.
                      Too late the UK government are already giving it away to the American government who then sell it onto private companies.

                      They do much the same thing with a collection of your data whenever you take a flight, anywhere (doesn't have to be to America).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X