Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
With all the associated crap that goes with it I should be finished it at 10:00, I will ask for more work where I will be told "The planning meeting is on Tuesday, you will have to wait till then"
Finished my one liner, well it turned out to be 2 lines.
I did a JSP page the other day, and just been told I missed a full stop, I changed it in front of the BA and checked it in, they are raising a defect just now on test director, the mail should be hitting my inbox any minute.
Anyway, that is me till Tuesday, pub lunch in 2 hours.
changed it in front of the BA and checked it in, they are raising a defect just now on test director, the mail should be hitting my inbox any minute.
That'll give you an excuse to delay do ing anything about it for a bit longer. Ask them to show you which acceptance criteria is affected by the full stop before you repair it. Tell them you need reference to teh applicable paragraph in the functional design. You'll be complying with 'best practises' and it'll give you plenty of time for a good pub lunch.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
With all the associated crap that goes with it I should be finished it at 10:00, I will ask for more work where I will be told "The planning meeting is on Tuesday, you will have to wait till then"
Finished my one liner, well it turned out to be 2 lines.
I did a JSP page the other day, and just been told I missed a full stop, I changed it in front of the BA and checked it in, they are raising a defect just now on test director, the mail should be hitting my inbox any minute.
Anyway, that is me till Tuesday, pub lunch in 2 hours.
one problem I consistently have as a tester is that I have to be constantly raiseing defects to prove that I am working. So to keep the numpties happy all defects no matter how minor are logged so that there is an audit trail. Would be quicker and easier to just have a quick chat with the dev to get most fixed but I have to appear to be doing lots to earn my money hence lots of bugs raised no matter what priority they are....
one problem I consistently have as a tester is that I have to be constantly raiseing defects to prove that I am working. So to keep the numpties happy all defects no matter how minor are logged so that there is an audit trail. Would be quicker and easier to just have a quick chat with the dev to get most fixed but I have to appear to be doing lots to earn my money hence lots of bugs raised no matter what priority they are....
I once worked at a place which had the amazingly stupid policy of paying testers a bonus for every bug found. Of course, one bug can very quickly be made into five if you find other screens or routines that access the same piece of code, and some people actually avoided reporting bugs in early test phases in the knowledge that they would grow out to much more bugs later on.
Eventually, having paid out some mid-range saloon car sized bonuses and seeing the stuff in the car park, the CIO decided to appoint a manager who knew something about testing. Party over.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
I once worked at a place which had the amazingly stupid policy of paying testers a bonus for every bug found. Of course, one bug can very quickly be made into five if you find other screens or routines that access the same piece of code, and some people actually avoided reporting bugs in early test phases in the knowledge that they would grow out to much more bugs later on.
Eventually, having paid out some mid-range saloon car sized bonuses and seeing the stuff in the car park, the CIO decided to appoint a manager who knew something about testing. Party over.
I think TheDailyWTF had something like that. The coders and testers worked as a team whereby the coder would fix a bug but leave some small aspect unresolved to be re-raised, or the coder would introduce tiny unimportant bugs so the tester could catch them.
Comment