• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

I don’t really give a tulip any more

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I have to be honest I could probably do my weeks work in about 4 hours and that is not my fault, the team I am in just create that environment.

    "can I have a DB password to finish this stored proc?"

    "you will have to wait a few days for that"

    "OK, do you have anything for me to do?"

    "can you wait for the planning meeting tomorrow"

    Bored out my tits.
    At clientco I assign 2 days for a 1 line change cos of all the stupid red tape. And they have armies of "SOX" w**kers chasing this stuff up

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post

      Bored out my tits.
      Tits would never ever bore me

      I would like to congratulate Mich on starting an excellent post, I think the majority of us share his views.

      Same tulip different client.

      Comment


        #83
        I have a one liner todo today.

        With all the associated crap that goes with it I should be finished it at 10:00, I will ask for more work where I will be told "The planning meeting is on Tuesday, you will have to wait till then"

        Comment


          #84
          Finished my one liner, well it turned out to be 2 lines.

          I did a JSP page the other day, and just been told I missed a full stop, I changed it in front of the BA and checked it in, they are raising a defect just now on test director, the mail should be hitting my inbox any minute.



          Anyway, that is me till Tuesday, pub lunch in 2 hours.

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by minestrone View Post
            changed it in front of the BA and checked it in, they are raising a defect just now on test director, the mail should be hitting my inbox any minute.
            That'll give you an excuse to delay do ing anything about it for a bit longer. Ask them to show you which acceptance criteria is affected by the full stop before you repair it. Tell them you need reference to teh applicable paragraph in the functional design. You'll be complying with 'best practises' and it'll give you plenty of time for a good pub lunch.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              I have a one liner todo today.

              With all the associated crap that goes with it I should be finished it at 10:00, I will ask for more work where I will be told "The planning meeting is on Tuesday, you will have to wait till then"
              Clearcase admin: head stream, rebase started

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                Finished my one liner, well it turned out to be 2 lines.

                I did a JSP page the other day, and just been told I missed a full stop, I changed it in front of the BA and checked it in, they are raising a defect just now on test director, the mail should be hitting my inbox any minute.



                Anyway, that is me till Tuesday, pub lunch in 2 hours.
                one problem I consistently have as a tester is that I have to be constantly raiseing defects to prove that I am working. So to keep the numpties happy all defects no matter how minor are logged so that there is an audit trail. Would be quicker and easier to just have a quick chat with the dev to get most fixed but I have to appear to be doing lots to earn my money hence lots of bugs raised no matter what priority they are....

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
                  one problem I consistently have as a tester is that I have to be constantly raiseing defects to prove that I am working. So to keep the numpties happy all defects no matter how minor are logged so that there is an audit trail. Would be quicker and easier to just have a quick chat with the dev to get most fixed but I have to appear to be doing lots to earn my money hence lots of bugs raised no matter what priority they are....
                  I once worked at a place which had the amazingly stupid policy of paying testers a bonus for every bug found. Of course, one bug can very quickly be made into five if you find other screens or routines that access the same piece of code, and some people actually avoided reporting bugs in early test phases in the knowledge that they would grow out to much more bugs later on.

                  Eventually, having paid out some mid-range saloon car sized bonuses and seeing the stuff in the car park, the CIO decided to appoint a manager who knew something about testing. Party over.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    I once worked at a place which had the amazingly stupid policy of paying testers a bonus for every bug found. Of course, one bug can very quickly be made into five if you find other screens or routines that access the same piece of code, and some people actually avoided reporting bugs in early test phases in the knowledge that they would grow out to much more bugs later on.

                    Eventually, having paid out some mid-range saloon car sized bonuses and seeing the stuff in the car park, the CIO decided to appoint a manager who knew something about testing. Party over.
                    I think TheDailyWTF had something like that. The coders and testers worked as a team whereby the coder would fix a bug but leave some small aspect unresolved to be re-raised, or the coder would introduce tiny unimportant bugs so the tester could catch them.
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      I once worked at a place which had the amazingly stupid policy of paying testers a bonus for every bug found.
                      What they should have done is taken the bonus out of the programmers pay
                      Coffee's for closers

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X