• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Beeb and VAT

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Why did Maggie close down coal mining anyway? did she believe that the North Sea gas would last forever? Whilst there will be coal for centuries to come and they've developed the technology to burn it very cleanly...and store the CO2 in a safe place.
    She figured out that Scargill would seek to make a political point out of a trade dispute - as had happened in the past. She judged that people were tired of this and regarded as anti-democratic (which it was of course) and that she'd been given a mandate to stop it. As a result she decided not to settle the dispute despite several opportunities. She felt she had to smash the whole industry to to show that the country and government wouldn't be held to ransom in this way again. Ironically, Scargill was right when he claimed the agenda was to smash the whole industry, he just wasn't bright enough to see that Thatcher was bound to win.

    If the two of them hadn't been on a political battlegound, we might still have a coal industry (although it'd no doubt be much smaller), but even I don't blame Thatcher for that (and I hate her) - she was only doing what she thought was right.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
      Why did Maggie close down coal mining anyway? did she believe that the North Sea gas would last forever? Whilst there will be coal for centuries to come and they've developed the technology to burn it very cleanly...and store the CO2 in a safe place.
      She was spoiling for a fight with the unions. The miners were the elite so they volunteered. She won.

      I'm not in favour of how the unions behaved in the 1970s, but the way the miners, and their communities, were smashed has left scars that will take generations to heal. And I don't mean by that just that some people are sour at losing.

      But Thatcher was like that. The GLC and the Metropolitan Counties had an annoying habit of being elected Labour, and disagreeing with her, so she abolished them. A layer of democratic government eliminated for daring to oppose The Leader.

      She was stuck on a train to Birmingham once for 3 hours without announcements or apologies: she never travelled by train again, and broke up the railways.

      Spite: cross her and get destroyed. Nothing to do with government, just power.
      Last edited by expat; 26 November 2008, 15:46.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by expat View Post
        She was spoiling for a fight with the unions. The miners were the elite so they volunteered. She won.

        I'm not in favour of how the unions behaved in the 1970s, but the way the miners, and their communities, were smashed has left scars that will take generations to heal. And I don't mean by that just that some people are sour at losing.

        But Thatcher was like that. The GLC and the Metropolitan Counties had an annoying habit of being elected Labour, and disagreeing with her, so she abolished them. A layer of democratic government eliminated for daring to oppose The Leader.

        She was stuck on a train to Birmingham once for 3 hours without announcements or apologies: she never travelled by train again, and broke up the railways.

        Spite: cross her and get destroyed. Nothing to do with government, just power.
        Watch it, Dodgy will be along to call you a hypocrite in a moment.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
          Not doubting your word (really I'm not) - can you elaborate on these taxes - I am genuinely interested in the history of this and I haven't heard it cited as a cause before.
          Essentially there was a tax levied on the difference between pre-war profit and war-time profit of 100% which combined with accountancy changes made it effectively way more than 100%, and bankrupted the companies. In 1949 Clement Attlee's Labour government set up the Iron and Steel Corporation of Great Britain. There was massive confusion about what companies were defined as companies to be nationalised and which weren't, thereby preventing most from raising finance to retool for many years, and driving what money that was looking to invest to competitor economies.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
            She figured out that Scargill would seek to make a political point out of a trade dispute - as had happened in the past. She judged that people were tired of this and regarded as anti-democratic (which it was of course) and that she'd been given a mandate to stop it. As a result she decided not to settle the dispute despite several opportunities. She felt she had to smash the whole industry to to show that the country and government wouldn't be held to ransom in this way again. Ironically, Scargill was right when he claimed the agenda was to smash the whole industry, he just wasn't bright enough to see that Thatcher was bound to win.

            If the two of them hadn't been on a political battlegound, we might still have a coal industry (although it'd no doubt be much smaller), but even I don't blame Thatcher for that (and I hate her) - she was only doing what she thought was right.

            What an astonishing spin on the miners dispute. Arthur Scargill couldnt have interpreted his position any better himself.The miners had been holding the country to ransom before Thatcher came along and the country decided to vote for someone who could remove the reliance on coal for power, or remove the power of the Unions. Coal was cheaper to buy from somewhere else, was uneconomical and therefore the mining Industry went out of business.

            Scargill's agenda had nothing to do with the welfare of the miners. He wanted to exploit his power and the miners to bring down Thatcher. It was the same with the print unions and it was the same with the unions who ran British Leyland. To use a throw away line as "agenda was to smash the whole industry" is quite ridiculous, and to suggest that ".

            I will just give you an example of how your redneck mind works: You said "As a result she decided not to settle the dispute despite several opportunities" .

            What do we assume from that? is that it she was patently out of order? Why are you not bright enough to simply ask the question? "on what terms?". Surely this is a fundamental question that anyone would ask.

            I despair with people like you that you can turn on someone who dismantled the evil system that was impoverishing people through sheer guts and determination, the effect of which being to enrich especially people like you.

            Your dogmatic one eyed stance on her suggests only that it is either "cool" in your social circle to "hate" Thatcher (middle class guilt) or that you are truly a Taleban mysoginist.
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by expat View Post
              She was spoiling for a fight with the unions. The miners were the elite so they volunteered. She won.

              I'm not in favour of how the unions behaved in the 1970s, but the way the miners, and their communities, were smashed has left scars that will take generations to heal. And I don't mean by that just that some people are sour at losing.

              But Thatcher was like that. The GLC and the Metropolitan Counties had an annoying habit of being elected Labour, and disagreeing with her, so she abolished them. A layer of democratic government eliminated for daring to oppose The Leader.

              She was stuck on a train to Birmingham once for 3 hours without announcements or apologies: she never travelled by train again, and broke up the railways.

              Spite: cross her and get destroyed. Nothing to do with government, just power.
              What do you mean that you were not in favour of how the Unions behaved? what a pathetic view. The Unions were a fundamental part of a huge series of monopolies that were impoverishing the people of Britain and leading us inexorably towards a totalitarian regime.
              These people controlled the media, the power Industry, transport and manufacturing. Your comment is like saying oh well Hitler only killed a few million so what?
              Just like PB you use glib one liners to sum up the entire dynamics of what was happening to Britain. When you say that she travelled on a train was late and then closed it down is the most utterly stupid simplistic attempt at analysis. The railways happened to be costly and inefficient and she didnt close them down did she?
              Thatcher was voted in on the back of a very clear agenda, she was not voted in and then suddenly decided to pursue personal vendettas.
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                Watch it, Dodgy will be along to call you a hypocrite in a moment.
                Hmm I see what you mean

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by expat View Post
                  Hmm I see what you mean
                  I didnt call either of you hypocrites, just every other name under the sun.
                  And just in case you dont know which sun it is, it is the one that shines out of my arse
                  Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    I didnt call either of you hypocrites, just every other name under the sun.
                    And just in case you dont know which sun it is, it is the one that shines out of my arse
                    Ah, not the newspaper that will get Labour elected again?

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by expat View Post
                      Ah, not the newspaper that will get Labour elected again?

                      This one

                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X