Why indeed do people spell "lose" as "loose"? I would really like to know.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
loose thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Loose morals?Originally posted by expat View PostWhy indeed do people spell "lose" as "loose"? I would really like to know."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
-
Let's face it, these people are loosers.Originally posted by expat View PostWhy indeed do people spell "lose" as "loose"? I would really like to know.
HTHComment
-
I always thought it was an Americanism till I noticed a lot of foreigners doing it here on CUK
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Probably because the pronunciation of a word and its spelling are only loosely related. How about spelling lose 'looz' or 'loos'?Originally posted by expat View PostWhy indeed do people spell "lose" as "loose"? I would really like to know.Comment
-
Toilet mouthOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostProbably because the pronunciation of a word and its spelling are only loosely related. How about spelling lose 'looz' or 'loos'?
Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
But the way that you spell a word correctly is by knowing how it is spelled, not by guessing. Or by having a more sophisticated understanding of how standard spellings come to be, but I do not think that we are talking about "more sophisticated" here.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostProbably because the pronunciation of a word and its spelling are only loosely related. How about spelling lose 'looz' or 'loos'?
Are you saying that all these loosers simply do not know how to spell the word "lose", but they either are unaware that they don't know (how can that be?), or they don't think it matters, they can just wing it? Because they can't.
Either you know how to spell it, or you look it up. It's not hard.Comment
-
It is if you are dyslexicOriginally posted by expat View PostBut the way that you spell a word correctly is by knowing how it is spelled, not by guessing. Or by having a more sophisticated understanding of how standard spellings come to be, but I do not think that we are talking about "more sophisticated" here.
Are you saying that all these loosers simply do not know how to spell the word "lose", but they either are unaware that they don't know (how can that be?), or they don't think it matters, they can just wing it? Because they can't.
Either you know how to spell it, or you look it up. It's not hard.
Just call me Matron - Too many handbagsComment
-
I imagine in most cases it's just carelessness. Whoever has never done so, let him loose the first stone.Originally posted by expat View PostBut the way that you spell a word correctly is by knowing how it is spelled, not by guessing. Or by having a more sophisticated understanding of how standard spellings come to be, but I do not think that we are talking about "more sophisticated" here.
Are you saying that all these loosers simply do not know how to spell the word "lose", but they either are unaware that they don't know (how can that be?), or they don't think it matters, they can just wing it? Because they can't.
Either you know how to spell it, or you look it up. It's not hard.
Learning to spell each and every word individually cures the symptoms but not the underlying cause - that language is carp. What a waste of time and brain cells in place of updating the spellings.
The first syllable of both 'loose' and 'lose', is 'loo' (I think). It appears to be that their spelling should differ in the second syllable, the 'se' rather than 'loo': Loose and looze.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment