- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Bank Stealth Tax
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View PostBBC News BBC Sport
404 - Page Not Found
This might be because you typed the web address incorrectly. Please check the address and spelling ensuring that it does not contain capital letters or spaces.
It is possible that the page you were looking for may have been moved, updated or deleted.
Please click the back button to try another link.
Or
* Visit the BBC News Home Page.
* Visit the BBC Sport Home Page.
* Explore our full list of sites and services.

Confusion is a natural state of being -
-
still doesnt work its the laugh adds / emotion thing on to the URL, god I'm good lolOriginally posted by Cyberman View Post
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7668020.stmComment
-
-
Haha Cyberman you made me LOL
so anyhoo, I bet all those Liemans and Fanny and Freddy shareholders are glad that the US govt didn't buy their bank and nationalise it. Oops, hang on...Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes View PostHaha Cyberman you made me LOL
so anyhoo, I bet all those Liemans and Fanny and Freddy shareholders are glad that the US govt didn't buy their bank and nationalise it. Oops, hang on...
That's a different scenario though. They simply had so much debt that there was no way they could continue as a private enterprise.
Comment
-
technically yes. But given the danger that if GB hadn't 'nationalised' the banks they might have disappeared altogether leaving their share price at 0p, you would surely have to concur that any action is better than that.Originally posted by Cyberman View PostThat's a different scenario though. They simply had so much debt that there was no way they could continue as a private enterprise.
Human nature being what it is once this whole thing is forgotten there will be a big round of privatisation of the banks and massive relaxation of lending criteria and off we will go again.
Seen it alllllll before. Banks have notoriously short memories.Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes View Posttechnically yes. But given the danger that if GB hadn't 'nationalised' the banks they might have disappeared altogether leaving their share price at 0p, you would surely have to concur that any action is better than that.
Human nature being what it is once this whole thing is forgotten there will be a big round of privatisation of the banks and massive relaxation of lending criteria and off we will go again.
Seen it alllllll before. Banks have notoriously short memories.
No, I don't concur, because having a banking background and being an AIB graduate, I have always understood the function of the BofE as Lender of the Last Resort. It has always been accepted that banks are the lifeblood of the economy and that you cannot just let them fail, or the whole economy will fail.
Gordon Brown and Mervyn King obviously did not understand this a year ago. It has taken them that long to come round to see commonsense. There is a certain bank that I will not mention
, because it bores people here, that should never have suffered nationalisation, because it had only a liquidity problem outside of its own control. It was the duty of the BofE to provide liquidity but it failed to do so. The court case is getting nearer by the day. 
When I invested in said bank, it was with the knowledge of the BofE's obligations, so I really do not think they have done any more favours than was their duty. Unfortunately, they failed in that duty in the case of you know who.
Comment
-
Concur! dammitOriginally posted by Cyberman View PostNo, I don't concur, because having a banking background and being an AIB graduate, I have always understood the function of the BofE as Lender of the Last Resort. It has always been accepted that banks are the lifeblood of the economy and that you cannot just let them fail, or the whole economy will fail.
Gordon Brown and Mervyn King obviously did not understand this a year ago. It has taken them that long to come round to see commonsense. There is a certain bank that I will not mention
, because it bores people here, that should never have suffered nationalisation, because it had only a liquidity problem outside of its own control. It was the duty of the BofE to provide liquidity but it failed to do so. The court case is getting nearer by the day. 
When I invested in said bank, it was with the knowledge of the BofE's obligations, so I really do not think they have done any more favours than was their duty. Unfortunately, they failed in that duty in the case of you know who.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment