Originally posted by Bob Dalek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who is buying all the shares?
Collapse
X
-
Why?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
Can I nominate this for next week's "Out of Thin Air (TM) Village Idiot of the Week competition"?Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostYou shouldn't be buying shares if you don't understand the function of a Market maker.
Anyway, what happens to shares if I sell and nobody immediately wants to buy them? Or do they sit around unsold until someone does?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
That is exactly what happens. In practice, you'll almost always find a buyer, it just might take some time...Originally posted by d000hg View PostCan I nominate this for next week's "Out of Thin Air (TM) Village Idiot of the Week competition"?
Anyway, what happens to shares if I sell and nobody immediately wants to buy them? Or do they sit around unsold until someone does?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Because you said, "but that's why you have lots of gambles to mitigate that risk."Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostWhy?Comment
-
Not very "compulsive" behaviour is it? Silly jibe.Originally posted by Bob Dalek View PostBecause you said, "but that's why you have lots of gambles to mitigate that risk.""See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Silly jibe? Well, sort of. But, my POV is that it IS gambling and the idea that "lots of gambles to mitigate that risk" sounds just like a horse racing punter who thinks that there's a System nobody else knows about, or that gambling is, in essence, always going to earn for you in the end. It ain't so.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostNot very "compulsive" behaviour is it? Silly jibe.Comment
-
Your analogy fails as we all know horse-racing is fixedOriginally posted by Bob Dalek View PostSilly jibe? Well, sort of. But, my POV is that it IS gambling and the idea that "lots of gambles to mitigate that risk" sounds just like a horse racing punter who thinks that there's a System nobody else knows about, or that gambling is, in essence, always going to earn for you in the end. It ain't so.
My point(s) is(are),
You make your gambles low risk by doing your research.
You make lots of gambles at a low value so up to 30-40% of them failing won't cause you to lose overall.
It's not a system, it's common sense. And there are people who make a living from both horses and the stock market."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
I rest my case.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostYour analogy fails as we all know horse-racing is fixed
My point(s) is(are),
You make your gambles low risk by doing your research.
You make lots of gambles at a low value so up to 30-40% of them failing won't cause you to lose overall.
It's not a system, it's common sense. And there are people who make a living from both horses and the stock market.Comment
-
You case is thrown out at half time as it's unproven.Originally posted by Bob Dalek View PostI rest my case."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
That's a dirty trick and I protest!Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostYou case is thrown out at half time as it's unproven.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Comment