Have no idea why this is a dilemma – of course accept the reduced rate, and work like hell to find another gig paying you the rate you need. If you only have a few months savings worth, then you have no choice, the longer you don’t have to touch the savings the better.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Currently considering a big cut
Collapse
X
-
-
Thanks for the feedback everyone. The general opinion follows my gut feeling that it's better to is to keep on trucking at the reduced rate rather than go broke.
The 3 day week thing could be a viable option and it is work from home (er myco office) so it doesn't really matter when I put the hours in.
No agent here, I'm direct to the client which always makes me feel goodOriginally posted by d000hg View PostWhen they say a 35% cut, is your agent still getting paid?
Moving to Montana soon, gonna be a dental floss tycoon
Comment
-
what about a same rate but less hours contract? cost client less and you get more time for plan B. You dont get something for nothing.NET Winforms roles seem to have dried up except for city slicker types with banking sector background. My CV is pretty good with recent .NET 2.0, 3.0 WCF, LINQ and the like but I'm getting the usual agency banter with nothing concrete emerging...not even an interview after a month of looking despite a couple having been promised.
My current client where the gig ends this Friday has offered me a rolling 1 week open ended contract until I can find something else paying better which is nice except it's at 65% of my current rate. They know I'll be off if something more lucrative appears but they have dangled the one week notice thing to make it more attractive.
I know some on here will respond with "tell 'em to screw off" but I do have bills to pay and only a few months backup in the bank, so it's a proposition I'm seriously considering. It seems a better option than going perm and still keeps a workable level of cash rolling in. Anyone else in a similar position?Comment
-
wow i read that and got a real sense of deja vu. or maybe you wrote it before? weirder things have happened - i mean i have written things before too. ah feck - you know what i mean. maybe.Originally posted by PRC1964 View PostI was in a similar situation around 2000.
What I did was to accept the rate cut but match it with an hours cut so I had time to look for work and develop plan B.
In the end I picked up a couple of direct contracts to cover the days I had off and did OK till I got a full time gig.
If you don't have a decent fighting fund, I'd say take their money while you look for something better. Who knows, you may be able to moonlight with them in the future.Comment
-
wssOriginally posted by SandyDown View PostHave no idea why this is a dilemma – of course accept the reduced rate, and work like hell to find another gig paying you the rate you need. If you only have a few months savings worth, then you have no choice, the longer you don’t have to touch the savings the better.Comment
-
-
Did noone else read this thread as having a N in it?!
Is it really just me?!!The pope is a tard.Comment
-
Originally posted by SallyAnne View PostDid noone else read this thread as having a N in it?!
Is it really just me?!!
It sounds like he's trying to avoid a big hole, not get into one.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostIt sounds like he's trying to avoid a big hole, not get into one.
ǝןqqıʍComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Comment