• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Big Bang day !!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    I'm pretty sure it was a guy called Higgs who predicted it, not Hawking. Hawking is the black-hole wheel chair guy.
    Hence, the Higg's Boson.
    Hawkings' Nobel would be for predicting that mini-black holes exist. If they are created, it will confirm his theory and he will get a Nobel.
    Bored.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by ace00 View Post
      Hence, the Higg's Boson.
      Hawkings' Nobel would be for predicting that mini-black holes exist. If they are created, it will confirm his theory and he will get a Nobel.
      What is he going to do with a 2 seater sports car?


      IGMC
      "If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by daviejones View Post
        What is he going to do with a 2 seater sports car?


        IGMC
        He needs a new set of wheels?

        IGMC too.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by ace00 View Post
          Hawkings' Nobel would be for predicting that mini-black holes exist.
          Perhaps in connection with their rapid evaporation, but their existence of any size was speculated about on long before Hawking, which he may or may not get a Nobel prize for. They are still not well understood, so a lot more theories may come and go.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
            Hawkings is good, but overrated by himself and the masses I feel. If he got the Nobel it would be for work on black holes, not directly to do with the experiments being done at Cern with the Higgs boson. I don't think he's all that highly rated by physicists (any more than anyone else), but I think more so for Hawkins than with most physicists, you wouldn't want to trust his opinion outside of the narrow realm of mathematics of black holes. In other words he don't arf talk a lot of carp and big himself up. Of course if you take his disability into account the guy is a genius, on black holes.
            The whole Nobel thing and Cern hinges on whether or not they find the Higgs boson. Hawkings thinks they won't and what they will find is something akin to supersymmetric partners to particles already known about. He believes this is the elusive 'dark matter' and if found would go onto to confirm his work on string theory.

            I think you're a little bit too dismissive of a very intelligent man (disability or not).
            "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

            On them! On them! They fail!

            Comment


              #76
              So the wife ask's 'oh have they switched it on?'

              Aye

              'And we're still here!' she proclaimed.

              'Aye' I said 'but they're not'

              'What!'

              'All the scientists have disappeared the whole experiment has vanished there's no explanation - it's all over the news'


              I got a good 20 seconds out of it before being chased...
              "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
                He also said the chance of producing a black hole (even a tiny one) from the LHC was about 1%.
                I'd have thought that a one in a hundred chance of possibly destroying the entire planet was an unacceptable risk, personally.
                The vegetarian option.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                  What's sasguru's opinion on all this? After all, he's the fooking genius round here.
                  My opinion is that it shouldn't matter to you whether you get sucked into a black hole or not. Anything will be an improvement on living in Swindon.
                  Hard Brexit now!
                  #prayfornodeal

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    My opinion is that it shouldn't matter to you whether you get sucked into a black hole or not. Anything will be an improvement on living in Swindon.
                    The vegetarian option.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
                      I'd have thought that a one in a hundred chance of possibly destroying the entire planet was an unacceptable risk, personally.
                      That's just a tiny one, which would (most likely) decay really quickly.

                      The chances of creating a "destroyer of worlds" are much smaller than that...
                      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X