• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Now the tories are attacking straight men

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    does Cameron really think that people are turning to the Tories because his party are embracing gay 'rights'?
    Interesting. One of the things I personally like about Cameron is that he's trying to drag the tories into the modern world. But hey, I guess every political party has it's dinosaur wing ...
    Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

    Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

    That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

    Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

    Comment


      #92
      but aren't the main parties just too similar now on all policies, there's no choice
      do they get lots of funding from gay rights lobbyists?

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by zeitghost
        The Tories used get some funding from tangerine, mains leads, and plastic bag suppliers... plus the odd bob or two from manufacturers of whips, canes 7 chains....
        Do you mean "got funding" or "spent their funding on"?

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
          More nonsense. It's like the atheist/agnostic version of creationism. The Da Vinci Code is fiction, you know.

          The gnostic gospels were written around 200AD. The accepted gospels were rather earlier: Mark 75AD, Matthew 85AD, Luke (and Acts) 85AD, John 100AD. The latest date for whole of the NT is 140AD. The manuscript evidence is that the Christians of that time (before Constantine, and before King James), rejected the newer writings, because they were not in accord with, or flatly contradicted what had already been written some 60-155 years earlier.

          If someone for political reasons writes a "gospel" today that says that Jesus was in fact a Vietnamese woman living in New York, it would also be rejected, for pretty much the same reason.
          Face it, none of them are contemporary with Jesus' lifetime (official or not), all the people who wrote them had their own agenda, and to top it all off, there is actually very little historical evidence that Jesus even existed in the first place.

          And what's the Da Vinci Code got to do with the argument anyway?
          Listen to my last album on Spotify

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by snaw View Post
            Interesting. One of the things I personally like about Cameron is that he's trying to drag the tories into the modern world. But hey, I guess every political party has it's dinosaur wing ...
            Drag being the operative word I suppose?
            Confusion is a natural state of being

            Comment

            Working...
            X