To those who don't believe AGW is real

[DimPrawn]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

HTH

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

HTH

[Mailman]

and
Sir John Houghton FRS, former chair of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).

No bias there then is there!

Its already been shown that the IPCC themselves were less than honest with the compilation of their original report.

Mailman

[TimberWolf]

Nope their 100% right.

You can't really argue against climate change DP, it's always happened. They are on to sure-fire winner on predicting climate change no matter how carp the hypothesis, as sure as predicting doom will occur in or after a boom

[sasguru]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

HTH

When?

[sasguru]

No bias there then is there!

Its already been shown that the IPCC themselves were less than honest with the compilation of their original report.

Mailman

Evidence?

[Mailman]

http://sacredscoop.com/?p=1055

Then again, I guess its all a conspiracy by the oil companies innit?

Also, do a search on the dodgy science around how the IPCC got to the point where they concluded it was mans fault the polar bears are drowning

Mailman

[sasguru]

http://sacredscoop.com/?p=1055

Then again, I guess its all a conspiracy by the oil companies innit?

Also, do a search on the dodgy science around how the IPCC got to the point where they concluded it was mans fault the polar bears are drowning

Mailman

So I should believe a web site titled Sacred Scoop:
"Christian Blog, Daily Devotions, World News"?

I refer you to my initial post and rest my case
You couldn't really make it up

[sasguru]

http://sacredscoop.com/?p=1055

Then again, I guess its all a conspiracy by the oil companies innit?

Also, do a search on the dodgy science around how the IPCC got to the point where they concluded it was mans fault the polar bears are drowning

Mailman

Oh BTW the "scientist" quoted in that "article" is this guy, Morner:
Note that he is an "associate professor" i.e. a professor not good enough to be offered tenure.

From his wiki entry:

"Mörner has written a number of works claiming to provide theoretical support for dowsing, also known as water witching. [2] James Randi, the famous debunker of pseudo-science offered Mörner his $1,000,000 prize if he could successfully demonstrate water-witching which Mörner has advocated as scientific. As of early 2008 Mörner had not accepted The Amazing Randi's Challenge. Randi wrote in 1998

I've described here previously how a pompous-assed "dowsing expert" named Nils-Axel Mörner, associate professor of geology from Stockholm University, has consistently refused to be tested for the Pigasus Prize. [3] "

No wonder you anti-AGW cretins are becoming a laughing stock

[Mailman]

Careful guru, your religion is only one step away from starting its own inquisition!

Mind you, that royal society document is a bit like HMRC publishing a report on how fair its tax recovery processes are

Mailman

[sasguru]

Mind you, that royal society document is a bit like HMRC publishing a report on how fair its tax recovery processes are

Mailman

Oh? How so?
I'm surprised you have the gall to post here after your last pathetic attempt