Who's better at handling the economy poll

[Diver]

She was a politician of conviction rather than consensus...

Which basically translates to: "she wasn't a pussy or a puppet"

[Churchill]

Which basically translates to: "she wasn't a pussy or a puppet"

Can we have a state funeral for Gordon Brown? Tomorrow?

[HairyArsedBloke]

Can we have a state funeral for Gordon Brown? Tomorrow?

Do we still have lime pits these days?

I don’t care what they do with the bits of the Snot Goblin’s body after he has been hung, drawn and quartered. Except the head, of course, that has to be on a pike at Traitors’ Gate at the Tower of London; next to that of B’Liar.

[Peoplesoft bloke]

The Iron Lady deserves it, if only for the Falklands.

No she doesn't. She was directly responsible for the defence cuts that allowed to happen in the first place - she should be held to account for that.

[Peoplesoft bloke]

She was a politician of conviction rather than consensus...

Indeed. Convictions like professing an opposition to smoking and being a non-smoker whilst her party took millions form tobacco companies and she took thousands as a consultant to Philip Morris.

She was just as twisted as the rest of them, she was just very good at getting thick and/or dishonest people to believe she was a conviction politician (even Gordon Brown and Tony said they believed that nonsense so that should indicate what a load of bulltulip it is).

[Churchill]

No she doesn't. She was directly responsible for the defence cuts that allowed to happen in the first place - she should be held to account for that.

Erm, no she wasn't. It was the previous occupants of No.10 who said to the Argentinian Government "Well, it doesn't look like we're in a posiition to maintain the Falklands, how're you fixed?" A similar position to that taken with Spain over Gibraltar. PSB, Learn your history young man.

[Diver]

No she doesn't. She was directly responsible for the defence cuts that allowed to happen in the first place - she should be held to account for that.

Indeed. Convictions like professing an opposition to smoking and being a non-smoker whilst her party took millions form tobacco companies and she took thousands as a consultant to Philip Morris.

She was just as twisted as the rest of them, she was just very good at getting thick and/or dishonest people to believe she was a conviction politician (even Gordon Brown and Tony said they believed that nonsense so that should indicate what a load of bulltulip it is).

And total knobheads to believe she wasn't

[Peoplesoft bloke]

Erm, no she wasn't. It was the previous occupants of No.10 who said to the Argentinian Government "Well, it doesn't look like we're in a posiition to maintain the Falklands, how're you fixed?" A similar position to that taken with Spain over Gibraltar. PSB, Learn your history young man.

Nice of you to call me young, but I am old enough to remember.

It's true that the previous lot had started negotiations - but Thatcher did nothing to conclude the negotiations - if the answer was "no change" and she was so tough - why not just say so?

The Thatcher government withdrew HMS Endurance from the Falklands in 1981 - defence cuts.

Even in March 1982 she took no action after the scrap metal dealers landed on South Georgia with an Argentine Naval escort.

This is an interesting perspective, based on the facts rather than the revisionist version, and no I don't know the bloke who wrote it.

As for my having to "learn history" - I am aware of Thatchers account that the invasion was a total surprise - but it happened on her watch and she should have known. I wonder if history would have been so kind to Jovial Jim if it had happened on his watch - of course it nearly did in 1977, but he sent Dreadnought because he hadn't cut all the budgets.