• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Who's better at handling the economy poll"

Collapse

  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Erm, no she wasn't. It was the previous occupants of No.10 who said to the Argentinian Government "Well, it doesn't look like we're in a posiition to maintain the Falklands, how're you fixed?" A similar position to that taken with Spain over Gibraltar. PSB, Learn your history young man.
    Nice of you to call me young, but I am old enough to remember.

    It's true that the previous lot had started negotiations - but Thatcher did nothing to conclude the negotiations - if the answer was "no change" and she was so tough - why not just say so?

    The Thatcher government withdrew HMS Endurance from the Falklands in 1981 - defence cuts.

    Even in March 1982 she took no action after the scrap metal dealers landed on South Georgia with an Argentine Naval escort.

    This is an interesting perspective, based on the facts rather than the revisionist version, and no I don't know the bloke who wrote it.

    As for my having to "learn history" - I am aware of Thatchers account that the invasion was a total surprise - but it happened on her watch and she should have known. I wonder if history would have been so kind to Jovial Jim if it had happened on his watch - of course it nearly did in 1977, but he sent Dreadnought because he hadn't cut all the budgets.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    No she doesn't. She was directly responsible for the defence cuts that allowed to happen in the first place - she should be held to account for that.


    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Indeed. Convictions like professing an opposition to smoking and being a non-smoker whilst her party took millions form tobacco companies and she took thousands as a consultant to Philip Morris.

    She was just as twisted as the rest of them, she was just very good at getting thick and/or dishonest people to believe she was a conviction politician (even Gordon Brown and Tony said they believed that nonsense so that should indicate what a load of bulltulip it is).
    And total knobheads to believe she wasn't

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    No she doesn't. She was directly responsible for the defence cuts that allowed to happen in the first place - she should be held to account for that.
    Erm, no she wasn't. It was the previous occupants of No.10 who said to the Argentinian Government "Well, it doesn't look like we're in a posiition to maintain the Falklands, how're you fixed?" A similar position to that taken with Spain over Gibraltar. PSB, Learn your history young man.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    She was a politician of conviction rather than consensus...
    Indeed. Convictions like professing an opposition to smoking and being a non-smoker whilst her party took millions form tobacco companies and she took thousands as a consultant to Philip Morris.

    She was just as twisted as the rest of them, she was just very good at getting thick and/or dishonest people to believe she was a conviction politician (even Gordon Brown and Tony said they believed that nonsense so that should indicate what a load of bulltulip it is).

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    The Iron Lady deserves it, if only for the Falklands.
    No she doesn't. She was directly responsible for the defence cuts that allowed to happen in the first place - she should be held to account for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Can we have a state funeral for Gordon Brown? Tomorrow?
    Do we still have lime pits these days?

    I don’t care what they do with the bits of the Snot Goblin’s body after he has been hung, drawn and quartered. Except the head, of course, that has to be on a pike at Traitors’ Gate at the Tower of London; next to that of B’Liar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    Which basically translates to: "she wasn't a pussy or a puppet"
    Can we have a state funeral for Gordon Brown? Tomorrow?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    She was a politician of conviction rather than consensus...
    Which basically translates to: "she wasn't a pussy or a puppet"

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    She was a politician of conviction rather than consensus...

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Did I hear correctly on the news that when she pops her clogs she will be given a full State Funeral... & the last time this happened was for Churchill
    The Iron Lady deserves it, if only for the Falklands.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Where it belongs - consigned to the dustbin of history. Unemployment, tax increases, QUANGOs , public spending increases - all Maggie's work.
    Did I hear correctly on the news that when she pops her clogs she will be given a full State Funeral... & the last time this happened was for Churchill

    Leave a comment:


  • shoes
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost


    <cough>

    ...
    on behalf of the alien overlords of course

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Where's the "the Americans" option?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    andyw for prime minister

    Leave a comment:


  • shoes
    replied
    It doesn't matter it's always the same civil servants that do the actual governing, politicians are puppets in their theatre of cruelty.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X