Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You know what they say about Socrates; a lovely little thinker, but a ... YouTube
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
After that they made him drink a dodgy cup of hemlock.
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
I agree, although what you call pseudo sciences are simply not. Economics is about the allocation of scarce resources, polsci is politics.
If more scientists understood human behaviour, as well as they understood their own disciplines, they would be more rounded and better able to identify workable solutions. eg: global warming.
Philosophy is central to all decision that are made, you can decide to have a consistent conscious philosophy, or not decide, and have a contradictory mongrel of philosophies (eg sasguru).
Politics is the translation of philosophy into how government should be designed and function, without this, on what basis do any scientists have a reason to make proposals on what should or should not be done about something.
Could someone convert that into formulas for me please?
Comment