At lunchtime today I walked past a spot where there’s usually a homeless person but this time just his dog was there whining. I felt really bad for it and it got me thinking if it amounts to cruelty for people that can’t feed, clothe or house themselves to keep pets.
I know it must be a pretty awful existence and to have a companion must be nice. I’m sure there must be some safety/security issues as well – if I was on the streets I’d feel safer with a dog. Also I’m sure it helps with begging to have a dog with you to tug on people’s heart strings.
All that aside – I wonder if it’s better or worse for the dog to be out on the streets with an owner rather than in a home?
Maybe if it’s better for them then more homeless people should be given dogs that would otherwise be impounded or destroyed?
Opinions anyone?
I know it must be a pretty awful existence and to have a companion must be nice. I’m sure there must be some safety/security issues as well – if I was on the streets I’d feel safer with a dog. Also I’m sure it helps with begging to have a dog with you to tug on people’s heart strings.
All that aside – I wonder if it’s better or worse for the dog to be out on the streets with an owner rather than in a home?
Maybe if it’s better for them then more homeless people should be given dogs that would otherwise be impounded or destroyed?
Opinions anyone?
Comment