Is that all?
100 a day equates to 25k per year more or less. Approximately 0.1% of the working population. As aTw points out it excludes in country transfers. Statistically insignificant in a flexible labour market.
Compare it to the amount of people permanently leaving the UK which is rather more than 25k.
If you are trying to stir up a fresh spot of jingoism you could at least try and find a figure that justifies the "shock horror" type approach.
Of course the increasing size of the labour pool versus those authorised to be in it might be more relevant.
100 a day equates to 25k per year more or less. Approximately 0.1% of the working population. As aTw points out it excludes in country transfers. Statistically insignificant in a flexible labour market.
Compare it to the amount of people permanently leaving the UK which is rather more than 25k.
If you are trying to stir up a fresh spot of jingoism you could at least try and find a figure that justifies the "shock horror" type approach.
Of course the increasing size of the labour pool versus those authorised to be in it might be more relevant.

), Australia and South Africa. These countries have very similar societies to Englands and people from these countries have proven time and time again to have the ability to assimilate with poms (or should that be "to be able to stand poms for any length of time without having to resort to detonating on a bus or in a train).
Comment