Originally posted by threaded
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If these LED traffic lights...
Collapse
X
-
Oops, that was Elektor. Did that 9 channel digi-proportional radio control from PE.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
-
He he! So did I.Originally posted by threaded View PostI had a go at that Formant Synthesizer, that was fun.
I was always building synths in my teens, and was in a rubbish band of hopeless teens that sounded like Kraftwerk on diazopan.
The Formant looked the dog's but sounded like rubbish mostly, but occasionally you'd get a brilliant, other-worldly noise out of it.
Sadly we didn't have samplers then!
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
well, there are lots of ways of spelling it, or, for correctness, use the original cyrillic. ЧебышёвOriginally posted by bogeyman View Postp.s. that would be a 'Chebyshev Filter' then?Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Ahem....... I had a sampler that plugged into the back of my Spectrum. Really.Originally posted by bogeyman View PostHe he! So did I.
I was always building synths in my teens, and was in a rubbish band of hopeless teens that sounded like Kraftwerk on diazopan.
The Formant looked the dog's but sounded like rubbish mostly, but occasionally you'd get a brilliant, other-worldly noise out of it.
Sadly we didn't have samplers then!
Only thing I ever made that worked was a 100w MOSFET power amp.Comment
-
Oh! Tell me about it (I think I tried wirewrapping the thing)Originally posted by zeitghostThose were the days, magazines stuffed to the brim with stuff you could never get working.
PE in particular...
And the Practical Wireless "Telewriter"...
I did successfully build the PE UK101 kit computer though.
Despite the fact that most of the chips in the kit were mfr's rejects and needed to be replaced.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Well there's a lot to be said for loud.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostAhem....... I had a sampler that plugged into the back of my Sepctrum. Really.
Only thing I ever made that worked was a 100w MOSFET power amp.
My music teacher said that if Mozart had had a 1KW PA, he would probably have tried to stun his audience rather than trying to impress then with the delicacy and whimsy of his compositions.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Perhaps if you ditch the Giant Alien Lizard Spotter circuit, then it could be more commercial. After-all it's only a few caps and res and a 'dual' 556.Originally posted by zeitghostThough it's easy to criticise the magazines for putting out stuff that is basically unrepeatable...
My design of a security camera switcher proved to have been designed in such a way that it worked with the CCTV cameras I had, & when one died, the replacement wouldn't work until I'd frigged about with the circuit a bit.
So far as I know, no one has built another system.
Just as well really.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Correct as ever Threaded!Originally posted by threaded View Postwell, there are lots of ways of spelling it, or, for correctness, use the original cyrillic. Чебышёв
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
They are reliable because they have sections - partial failure, not complete.Originally posted by zeitghost View Postare so wonderfully reliable and stuff, why have so many of them got failed sections in them?
It's like RAIDs - drives still fail, but data is saved.Comment
-
The automaton continues relentlessly on its course.Originally posted by AtW View PostThey are reliable because they have sections - partial failure, not complete.
It's like RAIDs - drives still fail, but data is saved.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment