Originally posted by shaunbhoy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Muppets 2........
Collapse
X
-
-
So you deem one law to take priority? If you are not passing anybody then you should pull over. It is not your job to police other idiots. It IS your job to drive according to the law.Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostTechnically and legally speaking, if you are doing 70mph in the middle lane then nobody should be attempting to overtake you that is not clearly intent on breaking the law. My view is if they are inconsiderate enough to ignore the speed limit then I am perfectly entitled to ignore their light-flashing. If they want to break the law do it in some other flipers lane, not mine.
Now I am not saying I stay in the middle lane all day, but I am certainly not going to increase the number of lane swaps I do to make it easy for boy racers. I will change lanes at a point I deem suitable to me, and not one that suits them.
The I am doing 70 brigade are a self rightous bunch of tossers.
My 90 mph does not inconvenience any other road users. Your lane hogging does. I assume that you do not break any other driving laws either?I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostThe I am doing 70 brigade are a self rightous bunch of tossers.
My 90 mph does not inconvenience any other road users.
70 is so slooooow. What are the valid arguments for not progressing the speed limit inline with the cars on the roads and how their safety aspects have progressed since 70 was introduced?
I remember many years ago (possibly as many as 15) that a guy I worked with who was an ex-copper said most times you'll not get bothered for doing 90 on a motorway unless you're being an arse. I've certainly done 80 past coppers sat at below 70 in the inside lane and not had any reaction off them. My logic being that if they're doing below 70 they expect me to overtake anyway. Never dared try 90 though!
I hate those Highways Agency vehicles that look like coppers from a distance, so many people sit behind them doing 60-70, even though they have no power to stop speeders.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Absolutely! It's actually recommended in the book "Very Advanced Driving" by A. Tom. Topper, and I would agree.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI would say that changing lane has to be more dangerous than staying in a lane, hence the safest motorway is one where the number of lane changes is minimised.
No?
threaded in "motorcycle examiner" modeInsanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
I expect that's what you do when you get behind the wheel / on the saddle.Originally posted by threaded View Post"Very Advanced Driving"
I expect you do "Very Advanced Tea and Toast Making" when you get up in the morning, before you have a "Very Advanced Dump, Shave and Shower" before going to do some "Very Advanced Contracting".
You're far too advanced for me, old stick.
[Bogey in 'what a pompous tit' mode]
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
That's gotta be either a wind up or out of context, but.....Originally posted by threaded View PostAbsolutely! It's actually recommended in the book "Very Advanced Driving" by A. Tom. Topper, and I would agree.
threaded in "motorcycle examiner" mode
Many years ago I recall roadcraft (I think) used to advocate NOT indicating.
The context was this. If you plan to not indicate you must then check if there is anybody you need to indicate to in order to ascertain the indicating is not required. This promotes awareness and checks. I can see the logic but never really agreed with this. Also it certainly wasn't the IAM view.Comment
-
I think they're called DeathCraft nowadays and have many shares in the Coop Funeral Service.Originally posted by ASB View PostMany years ago I recall roadcraft (I think) used to advocate NOT indicating
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
You could be on to something there - when you consider the significant number of incidents involving police vehicles with their drivers behaving poorly perhaps it is time they got a new book.....Originally posted by bogeyman View PostI think they're called DeathCraft nowadays and have many shares in the Coop Funeral Service.Comment
-
Yet another one of my little anecdotes, let me set the scene: I have one of them radar detectors in my car and was blasting about on country roads near Oxford and it suddenly goes off. So I slows down. A few seconds later a mini convoy of seriously fast cars, nose to tail, blasts past me like I'm stood. Thinks to myself that there's trouble up ahead for them... Moments later hear a crunch, and just as I round the next corner I see they're all piled into each other. It was a temporary road works light that'd set the detector off. All the fast cars: the plod on a high speed driving course.Originally posted by ASB View PostYou could be on to something there - when you consider the significant number of incidents involving police vehicles with their drivers behaving poorly perhaps it is time they got a new book.....
Bet they'd wish they'd had a radar detector, so what if the things are illegal, they save lives, mine being a good one to start with.
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
There only IS one law regarding maximum speed TLG. You should check up.Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostSo you deem one law to take priority?
I do, I don't, and I do.Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostIf you are not passing anybody then you should pull over. It is not your job to police other idiots. It IS your job to drive according to the law.
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
The I am doing 70 brigade are a self rightous bunch of tossers.
My 90 mph does not inconvenience any other road users. Your lane hogging does. I assume that you do not break any other driving laws either?

You breaking the law does NOT inconvenience others yet others sticking to the law inconveniences you. And you have the breathtaking hypocrisy to accuse others of being self-righteous.
For the record, and as I said earlier, I do not in general sit in the middle lane at 70 and DO move over when I deem it safe and sensible to do so. However, and this appears to be where our policies diverge, I do not scream along motorways at excessive and dangerous speeds expecting everyone else to move out of MY way because I am in a hurry and am obviously a better driver than everyone else, or at least I think I might be. That seems to be what you are advocating TLG. Is it? Are you really that good or just, as you come across here, an arrogant t0sser that equates good driving with a heavy right foot? Do enlighten us Lewis!!
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Today 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Yesterday 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17

Comment