• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The truth about global warming

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    If they are right it is probably too late already. Far too little, far too late. De industrialisation of a fairly grand scale would probably be needed.

    I predict a major boom in BTL straw huts and cart tracks.

    I predict a boom in car boats. That Lotus based one the other day doesn't sound so daft after all when you're faced with the possibilty of annual floods that would cost billions if not trillions to defend against.

    Maybe that's why there's so many townhouses being built with a garage at the ground level. Keeps the sofa dry.
    Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
    Feist - I Feel It All
    Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
      Indeed
      Assuming you're a believer... what do you propose we do about it then?

      I am of the opinion that governments around the world have no idea if GW is happening or not but they sure know how to exploit a tax cash cow when they see one.
      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
        Assuming you're a believer... what do you propose we do about it then?

        I am of the opinion that governments around the world have no idea if GW is happening or not but they sure know how to exploit a tax cash cow when they see one.
        A 'believer'?

        I tend to form my opinion on the basis of available evidence from credible sources.

        As I see it, the overwhelming majority of climatologists and scientists in related fields are sure that global warming is happening and is an effect far more rapid and extreme that the long term natural cycles of warming and cooling, and that it is MAN MADE.

        They have plenty of evidence of recent temp/CO2 trends and long term past trends (ice cores from thousands of years past etc.).

        On balance, I prefer to 'believe' highly skilled scientists. I don't think there is some 'agenda' or conspiracy here, or if there is, it's the 'ignore it, it will go away' propaganda from various vested interests in the oil and industrial lobbies.

        Many people want not to 'believe' because they want to carry on with their lifestyle unchanged and damn the consequences - they just don't want to feel guilty about it, so they pretend it's not a problem, or a big nutty conspiracy, or worst of all 'God's Will'.

        I agree that tax seems to be the only tool governments seem to apply to any problem, but that doesn't mean there isn't a problem.
        Last edited by bogeyman; 18 February 2008, 17:16.

        You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
          A 'believer'?

          I tend to form my opinion on the basis of available evidence from credible sources.

          As I see it, the overwhelming majority of climatologists and scientists in related fields are sure that global warming is happening and is an effect far more rapid and extreme that the long term natural cycles of warming and cooling, and that it is MAN MADE.

          They have plenty of evidence of recent temp/CO2 trends and long term past trends (ice cores from thousands of years past etc.).

          On balance, I prefer to 'believe' highly skilled scientists. I don't think there is some 'agenda' or conspiracy here, or if there is, it's the 'ignore it, it will go away' propaganda from various vested interests in the oil and industrial lobbies.

          Many people want not to 'believe' because they want to carry on with their lifestyle unchanged and damn the consequences - they just don't want to feel guilty about it, so they pretend it's not a problem, or a big nutty conspiracy, or worst of all 'God's Will'.

          I agree that tax seems to be the only tool governments seem to apply to any problem, but that doesn't mean there isn't a problem.
          Well said. The sad part is the problem doesn't seem unsolvable at all, but looking at reactions in this thread (and elsewhere) it looks like we're doomed..

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by XperTest View Post
            Well said. The sad part is the problem doesn't seem unsolvable at all, but looking at reactions in this thread (and elsewhere) it looks like we're doomed..
            How is it solvable in realistic terms?
            Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
            Feist - I Feel It All
            Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by PAH View Post
              How is it solvable in realistic terms?
              I think it is unlikely to be entirely solvable.

              Probably more a matter of being able to predict what's going to happen and change whatever we can to moderate the effects.

              Any kind of action on a scale that will make a real difference is unlikely. I don't think we can get out heads around it

              You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

              Comment


                #17
                Does it really matter? We'll adapt. Some will die. Most will not. That's life.

                The only real threat is a rising sea level and that's not going to be overnight. Plenty of time to move elsewhere or convert their homes into submersibles. They may even decide to drain some of the oceans into the giant holes left where the oil and gas used to be.

                Overall the forecast is for more rain instead of snow. No big deal, unless you live on a flood plain or valley bottom.
                Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
                Feist - I Feel It All
                Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by bogeyman View Post

                  Probably more a matter of being able to predict what's going to happen and change whatever we can to moderate the effects.
                  Which is what I originally said.

                  My point was there are lots of people who are only too willing to jump on the GW bandwagon with little understanding of what they are trying to tackle.
                  Last edited by gingerjedi; 18 February 2008, 18:25.
                  Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                    Which is what I originally said.

                    My point was there are lots of people who are only too willing to jump on the GW bandwagon with little understanding of what they are trying to tackle.
                    Whereas you, of course, have a gargantuan understanding of what we are trying to tackle, yes?

                    What are your qualifications in climatology, geology, physics, chemistry?

                    I'm just a layman in these matters myself, so tend to put my trust in papers that proper scientists publish rather than the Daily Mail letters column.
                    Last edited by bogeyman; 18 February 2008, 18:33.

                    You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by PAH View Post
                      Maybe that's why there's so many townhouses being built with a garage at the ground level. Keeps the sofa dry.
                      Those types of houses are a proper pain to strengthen to withstand earthquakes, and with all this global warming we'll soon be having lots of them.

                      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X