• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Mohamed Al Fayed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    Because "King Harry I" is just wrong.
    What about

    Cry God for Harry, England and St George!
    Who do you think Harry was then?

    You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      I'm sure his mum has plans to outlive him.
      You wouldn't be suggesting some sort of "bumping off" would you?

      Now that would be ironic!
      The vegetarian option.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
        What about



        Who do you think Harry was then?
        Secombe?
        Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
        Feist - I Feel It All
        Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
          What about



          Who do you think Harry was then?
          Harry Monk? (see www.viz.co.uk)
          "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


          Thomas Jefferson

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by PAH View Post
            Secombe?
            Potter?










            Henry V a Shakepeare play
            "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

            Comment


              #26
              In his evidence, Mr Al Fayed branded Prince Philip a "Nazi" and a "racist" and said: "It's time to send him back to Germany from where he comes."

              "You want to know his original name - it ends with Frankenstein," he added.
              :

              Al Fayed is a brilliantly absolutely ******* barking mad mentalist. He'd be great on here (maybe he already is?).
              Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by PAH View Post
                Gotcha.

                I only remembered his real name because it seemed strange at the time that he was named one thing but immediately called something else.

                Why don't they call William Bill?
                Not in upper or upper middle class circles. Normally, it's Will or Wills or some silly nickname. Bill or Billy is reserved for ordinary folk.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                  Is he allowed to say all the things he is in court with no evidence? Is he allowed to call Prince Philip a Nazi?
                  Yes, this is Britain where you are allowed to say what you like - unlike his native Egypt. It just makes the court much less likely to find in his favour.

                  And 'Nazi' isn't the fairest thing to call somebody who left Germany at the tender age of 12 to avoid having to join the Hitler Youth.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
                    I think it is safe to assume that Mr Al Fayed's Passport Application will not exactly be hurried through on the basis of this latest outburst.
                    Possibly it is because his application for British citizenship has been turned down so many times he has decided just to cause as much trouble as possible?

                    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                    Because "King Harry I" is just wrong.

                    Mind you, there's something strange about "King Charles III" too.
                    I heard (or maybe read) something recently that it is not automatic that he would take the title "King Charles III", he is more likely to take the title "King Arthur" or "King George".

                    Someone else can fill us in with which numbers those would be, I didn't do history at school.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Kind of funny when you think about it - when it comes around to Williams turn he'll be the closest thing to a genuine English king for several hundred (A thousand?) years; they only started speaking English as their first language relatively recently.
                      Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

                      Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

                      That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

                      Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X