Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
caught speeding 63mph in 40 :(
Collapse
X
-
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone -
You don't know who was driving, you're trying to help by requesting a photo.
BTW, how can a spray protect against a speed camera FFS?Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostYou don't know who was driving, you're trying to help by requesting a photo.
BTW, how can a spray protect against a speed camera FFS?
You are *MUCH* more likely to get 'let off' if you are pulled over for speeding by a NORMAL Police officer (black hat, black uniform) than by a TRAFFIC officer (white hat, green overcoat).
It's a traffic officer's JOB to catch you, where as it can be an inconvenience for a normal Police officer to actually go through with prosecuting you. Also, it is highly unlikely that a normal officer (as apposed to a Traffic officer) will be able to make a case against you if you are armed with the information in this course.
If a Traffic officer has evidence against you (note: not necessarily ENOUGH evidence for a conviction), then they will attempt to fine / prosecute you. The situation with an ordinary Police officer is less clear cut. Often, if you are particularly courteous and try to strike up a friendly banter with a Normal officer, they will give you a 'slap on the wrist' and send you on your way.
It is extremely important to remember to distinguish between the two types so that you are able to plan your attack. If you are pulled by a Traffic officer, then do not concede anything otherwise this evidence will be recorded and damning.
--------------
Top Tip # 2
--------------
AN EVEN LESSER KNOWN FACT
All speed pacing police cars have to have their Speedo's measured and certified. Typically, ONLY traffic police cars are calibrated, and the Speedo will have increments of 1 mph. If you are stopped by a NON-traffic officer, and told that he/she followed you, and you were speeding, simply ask as a matter of course when his Speedo was last calibrated. *It is likely he will let you go* when you ask this question since normal police (Beat) cars do not have certified Speedo's; theirs is the same as yours and mine!
So what did you think of the first 2 tips? Your feedback would be much appreciated.
I'll be sending you an email with a chance to enter the draw for a BTST detector in just a moment (if you haven't already received it). Just drop this back to us and you will be automatically entered.
and here is where I have ordered a detector:
http://www.BeatTheSpeedTrap.co.ukLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostYou don't know who was driving, you're trying to help by requesting a photo.
BTW, how can a spray protect against a speed camera FFS?Comment
-
Originally posted by chef View Postjust received a Notice of Intended prosecution for doing 63mph in a 40. It was on the princess parkway, manchester dual carraige way just before the 40 turns to 50 to 70 (M56) in the space of half a mile.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostIs this the spray on the number plate?
Hi-intensity IR LEDs behind the number plate should confuse the CCD in the camera. Especially if arranged to represent "F-OFF"...Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
Surely the best way to avoid a speeding fine IS NOT TO EXCEED THE SPEED LIMITIt's Deja-vu all over again!Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostYeah, how the hell is that supposed to work?
Hi-intensity IR LEDs behind the number plate should confuse the CCD in the camera. Especially if arranged to represent "F-OFF"...
I was met a man in a pub(!) who said it difused the light from the gun - but the only advice I ever took from a man in a pub was not to take advice from men in pubs.
In police camera action they tried it and disproved it - but they would say that wouldn't they?Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostYeah, how the hell is that supposed to work?
Hi-intensity IR LEDs behind the number plate should confuse the CCD in the camera. Especially if arranged to represent "F-OFF"...It's Deja-vu all over again!Comment
-
Wonder how many of you pro-speeding law breakers would feel if one of your loved ones were killed by a car doing, say, 40mph in a 30mph zone?
Would you shrug your shoulders and say just one of those things, drivers speed had nothing to do with it?
Thought not.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment