• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Computer Futures refusing my Umbrella

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    I think you are correct.
    I don't think it's that simple.

    The rule says, "may not make taking the job conditional on using the service".

    But they are not doing this.

    You (presumably) have the choice to take the job on a Ltd Company basis, and it's only because this option has been declined that the 'list' of brollies is given.

    tim

    Comment


      #22
      I wish you guys would do your own research. How can you conduct a business when you dont know this stuff.
      http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20033319.htm

      It is complex as stated above if you have turned down one option....

      Restriction on requiring work-seekers to use additional services
      5. Neither an agency nor an employment business may make the provision to a work-seeker of work-finding services conditional upon the work-seeker -

      • (a) using other services for which the Act does not prohibit the charging of a fee, or

        (b) hiring or purchasing goods,
      whether provided by the agency or the employment business or by any person with whom the agency or employment business is connected.
      The next problem is the word "connected". Are CF connected to the brollies?

      If you can afford it then walk away. It does none of us any good for CF or others to get away with this kindof practice.

      I am also not sure that this doesnt come under the heading of "restrictive practices".

      Any legal input would be appreciated. If this ever happens to me I will get legal advice and do something about it instead of asking a bunch of know nothings on a public forum.

      NOTE: I am not qualified to give this advice or opinion.
      I am not qualified to give the above advice!

      The original point and click interface by
      Smith and Wesson.

      Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
        If you can afford it then walk away.
        This is complicated by the fact that its an extension to an existing contract. (A 4 week extension.)

        You (presumably) have the choice to take the job on a Ltd Company basis, and it's only because this option has been declined that the 'list' of brollies is given.
        Contractor Umbrella is a limited company.
        Last edited by IanIan; 25 January 2008, 12:57.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by IanIan View Post
          This is complicated by the fact that its an extension to an existing contract. (A 4 week extension.)



          Contractor Umbrella is a limited company.
          So what has changed? Why do they want you to use this brolly suddenly?
          Tell them that as they are insisting on this change you want a higher rate to cover this new cost.
          Or dont take the extension.

          S/He means your own Ltd company.
          I am not qualified to give the above advice!

          The original point and click interface by
          Smith and Wesson.

          Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Wilmslow View Post
            Rough, but at the end of the day, you get paid in the same way, so why does it really matter, other than principle?

            At the end of the day CF will not be getting a good rep from this and given the choice of agents they will lose business, so, may as well go for one on their list and keep the gig, unless you can afford to get choosy only on priciple I guess.
            Quality of service? Reliability? Soundness of advice regarding what can and can't be claimed? Dispensation conversations?

            Make sure you do the normal checks before signing with any of them - I always make sure that they aren't being used by WindyAnna, just to make sure that they don't go bust
            Best Forum Advisor 2014
            Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
            Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

            Comment

            Working...
            X