• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

One for for Genghis Khan

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    If the public sector were to run as efficiently as say a top private enterprise then there would little need for us to earn vast amounts of money, there would be less crime and in alllikelihood we would lead healthier lives.
    Some of what you say is correct but can you give me an example of a 'top' private entreprise providing public services in this super efficient way. Who are these top private enterprises ? For efficient read 'provide as little as possible for as much as possible'. The privatised utility companies, the likes of BT and the large outsourcing Co's provide a pretty useles service from where I am sitting.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by HarryPearce View Post
      Outside now!

      Both I and my wife are civil servants[yes I used to be a connie as well but I have my reasons], I have a moderately well paid position but my wife who has only recently gone back to work is on the bottom pay scale. If you'd like to stand outside I'm sure we'd both like to discuss your virulent fascist remarks.
      Well, I did say a fair number - not all. My mum was one of these unsung, underpaid heroines of the NHS and she has a similar opinion to me. I can see that you are not one of those civil servants who constantly whinges about what a crap job/conditions/pay you have but backs away from getting another one.
      My problem is that I have met and worked with a lot of people who are like that and their lack of get up and go and willingness to take responsibility would make it hard for them to work in the private sector. And the fact that in certain sections of the public sector, it is practically impossible to lose your job without committing a serious criminal offence. It is probably cheaper to leave these poeple where they are.

      Fascist is a very strong insult by the way and completely unwarranted in this situation.
      +50 Xeno Geek Points
      Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
      As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

      Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

      CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by rootsnall View Post
        Some of what you say is correct but can you give me an example of a 'top' private entreprise providing public services in this super efficient way. Who are these top private enterprises ? For efficient read 'provide as little as possible for as much as possible'. The privatised utility companies, the likes of BT and the large outsourcing Co's provide a pretty useles service from where I am sitting.
        If BT and large outsourcing Co's were not giving the customer what they want there is plenty of choice. I tend to find that contractors are more caring of their own agenda when criticising the likes of crap gemini etc.

        Privatised utility companies are monopolies.

        Top enterprises that provide public services are evrywhere, from the top public schools to BUPA. The sale of food (the availability of which is more important than health or education- without out it you die) is a service that illustrates so well how efficient business can be in delivering services.
        Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Zippy View Post
          Well, I did say a fair number - not all. My mum was one of these unsung, underpaid heroines of the NHS and she has a similar opinion to me. I can see that you are not one of those civil servants who constantly whinges about what a crap job/conditions/pay you have but backs away from getting another one.
          My problem is that I have met and worked with a lot of people who are like that and their lack of get up and go and willingness to take responsibility would make it hard for them to work in the private sector. And the fact that in certain sections of the public sector, it is practically impossible to lose your job without committing a serious criminal offence. It is probably cheaper to leave these poeple where they are.

          Fascist is a very strong insult by the way and completely unwarranted in this situation.
          well put
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by hugebrain View Post
            You do realise this top one percent includes us contractors...
            Sadly not me .....
            +50 Xeno Geek Points
            Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
            As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

            Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

            CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
              Do you only get so many vouchers for road accidents then? What happens if you have a particularly bad month?

              The key point is "Free at the point of delivery".
              Duh! Surely it'd be a case of vouchers per requirement, and emergencies being seen to at the nearest A&E.

              e.g.
              1. I have to get a hip replaced. I get a Hip Replacement voucher. I take it to the best hospital I can.

              2. I get knocked down by a car, and am in a bad way. So, it's straight off to the nearest A&E, no voucher required, as this isn't a situation that has the luxury of choice. Aftercare, though, would have its own voucher, and, again, I'm free to choose where that happens.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by DBA_bloke View Post
                Duh! Surely it'd be a case of vouchers per requirement, and emergencies being seen to at the nearest A&E.

                e.g.
                1. I have to get a hip replaced. I get a Hip Replacement voucher. I take it to the best hospital I can.

                2. I get knocked down by a car, and am in a bad way. So, it's straight off to the nearest A&E, no voucher required, as this isn't a situation that has the luxury of choice. Aftercare, though, would have its own voucher, and, again, I'm free to choose where that happens.
                At least you are making the effort to think about how such a system might work, which is more than can be said for our ruling classes.
                Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by DBA_bloke View Post
                  Duh! Surely it'd be a case of vouchers per requirement, and emergencies being seen to at the nearest A&E.

                  e.g.
                  1. I have to get a hip replaced. I get a Hip Replacement voucher. I take it to the best hospital I can.

                  2. I get knocked down by a car, and am in a bad way. So, it's straight off to the nearest A&E, no voucher required, as this isn't a situation that has the luxury of choice. Aftercare, though, would have its own voucher, and, again, I'm free to choose where that happens.
                  Who says you need a hip replacement? Your GP? Physio? Or an Orthopedic Surgeon?

                  Typically you'd need to go through 3-4 different vouchers for such a major operation.

                  You're introducing a whole layer of administration into a system already burdened with too many managers.

                  You're also introducing a two tier system where folk who can afford to travel to the better hospitals get to use their voucher there (I'm assuming here that your voucher is only good for so much ambulance/transfer)

                  Nice idea, unworkable I'd say.
                  ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Isn't that the French model (Private hospitals competing for public money)? Which is widely regarded as one of the best in the world, why can't we just copy it?
                    Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                      Isn't that the French model (Private hospitals competing for public money)? Which is widely regarded as one of the best in the world, why can't we just copy it?
                      Because no Brit (should be British) would ever admit that anything French is better than what we have.
                      It's Deja-vu all over again!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X