I have my doubts as to the accuracy of some of the above "what a clever, clever evil mastermind I've been by out-pimping the pimp" answers. So much dog poo, I bet.
The Client is going to be very feckin' wary about hiring you direct. It'll be so obvious that you've scammed a pimp; and the Client will be thinking of the hellish horror of said scorned pimp threatening action, etc., which no Client wants. Clients often have favourite agencies/pimps; how likely is it that they'd risk pissing them off for a lousy 15-20% saving?
And if (probably when) the pimp realizes what you've done? What then? Going to casually fob him off with a pithy Oscar Wilde quote? A very quick trawl through the hallowed pages of CUK will show that some contractors have been either sued, or threatened with such, by pimps for all manner of "offences", so a piss-take like going direct with their info is a dead cert. Also, pimps, like Contractors, are "fiscal nomads", too. Do you fancy having your name rubbed in the poo across the agencies by an agent you once so "very cleverly" out-pimped?
I wouldn't recommend this "clever" approach, because it's ... er ... obviously not clever. It could really do you damage.
The Client is going to be very feckin' wary about hiring you direct. It'll be so obvious that you've scammed a pimp; and the Client will be thinking of the hellish horror of said scorned pimp threatening action, etc., which no Client wants. Clients often have favourite agencies/pimps; how likely is it that they'd risk pissing them off for a lousy 15-20% saving?
And if (probably when) the pimp realizes what you've done? What then? Going to casually fob him off with a pithy Oscar Wilde quote? A very quick trawl through the hallowed pages of CUK will show that some contractors have been either sued, or threatened with such, by pimps for all manner of "offences", so a piss-take like going direct with their info is a dead cert. Also, pimps, like Contractors, are "fiscal nomads", too. Do you fancy having your name rubbed in the poo across the agencies by an agent you once so "very cleverly" out-pimped?
I wouldn't recommend this "clever" approach, because it's ... er ... obviously not clever. It could really do you damage.
Comment