- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Britain faces Iraq rout
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostI did not mention either casualties or prisoners. You did.
I merely said that we would lose men. meaning KIA.
Strafing is a generic term (from the German as well
). I should have said strafing a column which would have explained it in easier terms for you. so no point on that point. (how long did it take you to google it anyway?)
Once again check my original post. I said that they would have to find a route, the operative word here is THEY.
So no points for you at all I'm afraid.
You have done nothing but waste time disproving comments and observations that you have made not me.
In your opening post you claimed that we would lose 'not a few' men and that 'a lot' of our young men are going to die.
All I ask is that you clarify that, maybe quantify it, Is the casualty rate going to go up ?, is it going to rocket. Is it going to be a disaster?
You spoke with such certainty.
ok
you cant explain how we will be enfiladed whilst withdrawing
you have no idea what the anticpated casulty rates will be
you have no idea where these unpopulated retreat paths are to be found
Lastly
We will have to provide an armoured diversion..... What the flying **** is that supposed to mean ???
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
1. Go up from what? we haven't started a withdrawal yet have we????Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostIn your opening post you claimed that we would lose 'not a few' men and that 'a lot' of our young men are going to die.
1. All I ask is that you clarify that, maybe quantify it, Is the casualty rate going to go up ?, is it going to rocket. Is it going to be a disaster?
You spoke with such certainty.
ok
2. you cant explain how we will be enfiladed whilst withdrawing
3. you have no idea what the anticpated casulty rates will be
4. you have no idea where these unpopulated retreat paths are to be found
Lastly
We will have to provide an armoured diversion..... What the flying **** is that supposed to mean ???

2. Any column of men retreating in column through enemy held territory is subject to fire along the length of it's column. How many ways can I explain this
(Look, just google it will you)
3. Not even the military have any idea on that (I googled it 5 minutes ago and they estimate it to be in double figures as well) I made no assumption as to figures in my original post (did you actually read it)
4. I stated that their best course would be to retreat through an unpopulated area. I made no inference whatsoever that I knew where that route was.
You have so far gone in a complete circle making assumptions based on facts and comments that were never posted except by yourself
Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Comment
-
Twenty minutes you've been replying to the last post.
You must be p1ssed or googling (or both) EO
Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
A valiant effort by EO but the demon drink got him in the end
An intelligent argument that finally lost to sobriety.
I thoroughly enjoyed the intelligent discourse, even though it started to degenerate into repetition (and slurred speech) towards the end.
Remind me not to get into a debate with you when you have your faculties about you EO
Goodnight
Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
TBH I'm not sure I'd want to either of you to lead a retreat...sounds like it would be complete carnage.
EO : Captain Darling
Diver : General Melchett
Guess that leaves me as Private Baldrick..oh well...story of my life.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
Ahh! And it took you so long to post too. (Quarter of an hour?)Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostTBH I'm not sure I'd want to either of you to lead a retreat...sounds like it would be complete carnage.
EO : Captain Darling
Diver : General Melchett
Guess that leaves me as Private Baldrick..oh well...story of my life.
Should have been here hours ago, you could have joined in the fun.
Anyway, I'm off now. have to be up for 5 am
goodnight
Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
This could be like Dunkirk, they'd need civilian owners to donate a fleet of Cayenne Turbos and supercharged Range Rovers to get them out double quick. Ken Livingstone could help commandeer them.
Then the owners get them back, painted sand colour and with the odd bullet hole.Comment
-
But how many Range Rovers will still be runnning in 40 years for the celebreation party?"If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment