• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Langham - looks a little sus to me

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    It is not for us to judge.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by shoes
      Mob rule a go-go

      I bet he weighs the same as a swan.
      'twas a duck...

      Comment


        #13
        According to Sky News, he's been charged with "buggery". Isn't that just anal sex? Is that illegal? And how did they know he'd been downloading child porn? Do these things get monitored?

        Saw a documentary about Jonathan King a while ago. What a creep he is. He maintained he isn't a paedophile, because of some obscure legislation somewhere which said it's only paedophilia if the child is under 14. Can't remember the exact details. Creeps like him shouldn't be allowed to roam free - ever.

        Personally I think Chris Langham just made a stupid mistake. If you're going to research something like this, surely tell the police first.

        Comment


          #14
          isn't his excuse like saying, 'i shot someone to get into the character of a murderer'.

          he's cluctching at straws IMO.

          Comment


            #15
            "I'm appearing in a play as a tax dodging IT contractor and needed to get into character"

            Will be my response when the tax inspector calls.

            Comment


              #16
              Yeah, right.

              Research? RESEARCH??

              I find it just incredible that he's proffered THAT as his "excuse".

              Comment


                #17
                Do you reckon it's possible to judge the guilt of these celebrities by whether their celebrity mates stand up for them? For example, that Matthew Kelly one: (off wiki) "In January 2003 he was arrested after an allegation that he had sexually abused a boy under 16." I remember there was a flood of celebs coming forward to say it wasn't possible and that he was a lovely bloke who would never do such a thing. And all charges were dropped of course. What was amazing about that example was that it happens so rarely. Jonathan King, Gary Glitter, Pete Townsend, Michael Barrymore... there must be loads more, and now Chris Langham. I don't recall any of those having many, if any, fellow celebrities speaking out in their favour. I dunno, maybe these celebs just want to keep their heads down and stay out of it.

                Comment


                  #18
                  And how did they know he'd been downloading child porn? Do these things get monitored?
                  All your downloads and emails can be monitored!
                  Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Alf W
                    All your downloads and emails can be monitored!
                    Your search engine, ISP keep a record of it for 18 months or more

                    every site you visit is logged, every page every download, every Email.
                    Confusion is a natural state of being

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Diver
                      Your search engine, ISP keep a record of it for 18 months or more

                      every site you visit is logged, every page every download, every Email.
                      Oh sh1t!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X